1959
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90011-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulation of cleavage in Arbacia eggs with desoxyribonucleic acid fractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1983
1983

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their mechanisms of action and chemical structures are at present speculative. However, the importance of a DNA digest in relation to systems involved in DNA synthesis has been cited in several reports (Butros, 1959;Taliaferro and Jaroslow, 1960). As far as the antagonist is concerned, a literature survey has not revealed the existence of such a component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their mechanisms of action and chemical structures are at present speculative. However, the importance of a DNA digest in relation to systems involved in DNA synthesis has been cited in several reports (Butros, 1959;Taliaferro and Jaroslow, 1960). As far as the antagonist is concerned, a literature survey has not revealed the existence of such a component.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…04. ticed in studies of induction. Niu [1,2], Butros [3] and Benitez et al [4] first tested the ability of ribonucleoproteins and ribonucleic acids to enter the indeterminate embryonic cells and induce them to differentiate into a homogenetic, highly specific cell type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We already have referred more specifically to the data of Hotta and Stern (39) and Takats (75). In addition, Butros (16) has observed a relationship between rates of cleavage of Arbacia eggs and the presence of specific DNA digests. A relationship between the levels of acid deoxyribonuclease in different tissues and species and rates of multiplication of the cells involved has been noted (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%