2002
DOI: 10.3109/17453670209178027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stemmed femoral knee prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on initial investigations, an optimum distance of 242mm from the distal most point on the condyles was selected. This manner of fixation is consistent with numerous previous FE [21,23,37,[39][40][41][42] and experimental investigations [20,36,40,43]. In addition by reducing the overall geometrical size of the model by half, a higher resolution mesh could then be applied without significant increase in computational run time.…”
Section: Materials Properties Loading and Boundary Conditionssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on initial investigations, an optimum distance of 242mm from the distal most point on the condyles was selected. This manner of fixation is consistent with numerous previous FE [21,23,37,[39][40][41][42] and experimental investigations [20,36,40,43]. In addition by reducing the overall geometrical size of the model by half, a higher resolution mesh could then be applied without significant increase in computational run time.…”
Section: Materials Properties Loading and Boundary Conditionssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Prosthesis induced stress-shielding is commonly observed following implantation [23,42,[48][49][50][51], with the pattern and severity of bone loss differing with different implant types and fixation [23,24,39,42]. While the long stemmed implant investigated here exhibited the lowest levels of motion and was found to be least sensitive to surgical cut errors, the presence of a long diaphyseal engaging stem may lead to greater bone loss over time in comparison to a stemless implant [21,23]. Should sufficient loosening of the implant occur distally due to prosthesis induced bone loss at the interface, then the majority of the joint reaction force would be transmitted solely through the prosthesis [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1] Microporous titanium provides two additional advantages for implant applications: first, it reduces the stiffness of the material, thus reducing stress shielding, [2,3] and, second, it improves implant anchorage by allowing bone ingrowth. [4][5][6] To date, powder metallurgy approaches have been widely used to create porous Ti structures, through partial sintering, [7][8][9] inclusion of pore formers, [10][11][12][13] expansion of pores pressurized with argon or hydrogen gas, [14,15] or replication of cellular polymers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the evaluation of THAs, the periprosthetic bone was studied by the analysis of the 7 Region of Interests (ROI) around the stem according to Gruen (31) (Figures 3, 4). In case of rTKAs 8 ROI were evaluated (32)(33)(34) (Figures 5, 6). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%