HR variability during the early phase of AMI is decreased and is significantly related to clinical and hemodynamic indexes of severity. The causes for the observed changes in HR variability during AMI may be reduced vagal and/or increased sympathetic outflow to the heart. It is suggested that early measurements of HR variability during AMI may offer important clinical information and contribute to the early risk stratification of patients.

IntroductionOur objective was to evaluate longitudinally the main bone-mass and quality predictors in young juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients by using lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, radius peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), and phalangeal quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) at the same time.MethodsIn total, 245 patients (172 females, 73 males; median age, 15.6 years: 148 oligoarticular, 55 polyarticular, 20 systemic, and 22 enthesitis-related-arthritis (ERA) onset) entered the study. Of these, 166 patients were evaluated longitudinally. Data were compared with two age- and sex-matched control groups.ResultsIn comparison with controls, JIA patients, but not with ERA, had a reduced spine bone-mineral apparent density (BMAD) standard deviation score (P < 0.001) and musculoskeletal deficits, with significantly lower levels of trabecular bone mineral density (TrabBMD) (P < 0.0001), muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) (P < 0.005), and density-weighted polar section modulus (SSIp) (P < 0.05). In contrast, JIA showed fat CSA significantly higher than controls (P < 0.0001). Finally, JIA patients had a significant reduced amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SoS) (P < 0.001), and QUS z score (P < 0.005).Longitudinally, we did not find any difference in all JIA patients in comparison with baseline, except for the SSIp value that normalized. Analyzing the treatments, a significant negative correlation among spine BMAD values, TrabBMD, AD-SoS, and systemic and/or intraarticular corticosteroids, and a positive correlation among TNF-α-blocking agents and spine BMAD, TrabBMD, and AD-SoS were observed.ConclusionsJIA patients have a low bone mass that, after a first increase due to the therapy, does not reach the normal condition over time. The pronounced bone deficits in JIA are greater than would be expected because of reduction in muscle cross-sectional area. Thus, bone alterations in JIA likely represent a mixed defect of bone accrual and lower muscle forces.

Background Few prospective data have been published on the comparison of bone density and quality in homogeneous groups of patients with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Objective and hypothesis The objective of this study is to perform a longitudinal evaluation of the prevalence and the characteristics of bone mass and quality and to evaluate the differences on the bone parameters, using DXA, pQCT and QUS. Population and/or methods Forty-three JSLE patients (35 females, 8 males, median age 18.8, range 14.0–34.1 years) have been studied with DXA, pQCT and QUS scans and compared with 138 JIA patients (112 females, 26 males, median age 18.9, range 13.4–33.2 years), and 79 controls (59 females, 20 males; median age 19.3, range 13.5–36.5 years). Of these, 39 patients (32 females and 7 males, median age 20.3, range 16.6–36.8 years) with JSLE were followed longitudinally and compared with 131 patients (108 females, 23 males median age 20.7, range 15.8–37.1 years) with JIA and 63 controls (48 females, 15 males; median age 21.9, range 15.5–38.3 years). Results JSLE patients have a higher bone cortical density (CrtBMD) than controls and JIA patients ( p < 0.005). However, JSLE and JIA patients have a significantly reduced bone trabecular density (TrbBMD) compared to controls ( p < 0.0001), with no differences between JSLE and JIA. In addition, JIA patients show a significantly reduced muscle area (MuscleCSA) compared to JSLE and controls ( p < 0.001). Conversely, fat area (FatCSA) is significantly increased both in JIA and JSLE patients when compared to controls ( p < 0.001), with no differences between the JSLE and JIA groups. Analogous results are observed in the polar resistance to stress (SSIp). On longitudinal evaluation, contrary to CrtBMD, the difference between BMAD SDS, TrbBMD, MuscleCSA and FatCSA remains unchanged; in JSLE patients, SSIp is stable in comparison to JIA and controls without any difference between the two groups. Conclusions The evaluation of bone density and structure parameters in JSLE patients highlights significant differences compared with JIA patients and controls. These data might indicate a different pathogenesis of bone damage in the two entities, and suggest a different diagnostic and therapeutic approach to improve the peak bone mass.

SummaryIntroduction. Recent acquisitions of the complex mechanisms of osseointegration between implants and host bone have gained attention, accordingly to the methods of evaluation of these interactions. DEXA analysis is considered an useful tool to assess such phenomena, in order to analyse in a quantitative manner the local metabolic activity of the bone, and to evaluate over the time the integration between host bone and prosthetic components. The purpose of the present study is to report about a preliminary experience in the analysis of osseointegration processes of patients undergoing a primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) or a revision Total Knee Arthroplasty (rTKA). Materials and methods. Thirty patients undergoing THA and nineteen undergoing rTKA were included in this study. In fifteen cases of THA a standard cementless stem was used; in the other fifteen a short cementless stem was chosen. In all cases a cementless cup was implanted. In all patients undergoing rTKA, all implants had pressfit femoral and tibial diaphyseal stems; only the femoral component and the tibial plateau were cemented. DEXA evaluation was performed preoperatively, and at 3, 6, 12, and 24