‘Stay home’: age and gender frames and limits of residential family solidarities in the times of lockdown (a French example)

Kushtanina, Veronika; Vinel, Virginie

doi:10.1080/14616696.2020.1832239

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The family has also been a locus for solidarity to be expressed, challenged, and tested (Kushtanina and Vinel 2020). Using longitudinal survey data, Borkowska and Laurence (2020) analyzed social cohesion in England before and during the pandemic.…”

Section: Solidarity and Cohesionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of the coronavirus crisis on European societies. What have we learnt and where do we go from here? – Introduction to the COVID volume

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The coronavirus pandemic, which first impacted European societies in early 2020, has created a twofold crisis by combining a health threat with economic turmoil. While the crisis has affected all European societies very significantly, its impact varies across countries, social groups, and societal domains. In an effort to provide a first overview of the effect of the coronavirus crisis, in this editorial we discuss contributions of 58 papers published as part of this special issue. These early research papers illustrate the varied impact of the pandemic on various areas of social life. The first group of studies in this special issue analyzes the effect of the pandemic on social inequalities with respect to gender, ethnic otherness, education, and work. A second stream of research focuses on the psychological consequences of the pandemic, especially with respect to wellbeing and resilience. Thirdly, the crisis is discussed on a societal level, in regard to welfare states, social policies, and approaches to crisis governance. In a fourth line of inquiry, several studies have analyzed the impact of the pandemic on social solidarity and cohesion. A fifth strand of research is devoted to examining the role of culture and lifestyles. This review ends with a discussion of areas for future research trajectories.

show abstract

Section: Solidarity and Cohesionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of the coronavirus crisis on European societies. What have we learnt and where do we go from here? – Introduction to the COVID volume

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…De façon inédite, des milliers d'établissements ont simultanément dématérialisé une partie ou la totalité de leurs postes de travail pour motif sanitaire, afin de limiter les risques de contamination entre collègues (Belzunegui-Eraso et Erro-Garcés 2020)et non plus à des fins budgétaires de stratégie productive, d'investissement du personnel ou de préoccupation environnementale. Ce mouvement a notamment concerné le secteur des services, dont les employés ont été confinés dans l'espace familial, présenté par les politiques publiques comme un « abri » sanitaire (Kushtanina et Vinel 2020). Ainsi en France, de mars à mai 2020, un tiers des salariés a continué à exercer son activité sur le lieu de travail, un second tiers a cessé toute activité, via le chômage partiel, les congés ou la perte d'emploi, tandis que le dernier tiers est passé en télétravail (Safi et al 2020).…”

Section: -Introductionunclassified

Le surtravail ou la fragmentation? Transactions familiales et temps de travail en période de COVID‐19

Clouet

2022

Revue Int du Travail

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Le surtravail ou la fragmentation ? Transactions familiales et temps de travail en période de Covid-19 Hadrien Clouet Résumé Comment évolue le temps de travail des télétravailleurs confinés par les mesures sanitaires françaises de l'année 2020, marquée par la pandémie de Covid-19 ? À partir d'une enquête qualitative conduite dans une régie municipale de production, distribution et traitement de l'eau, cet article montre que le télétravail pour motif de Covid-19 restructure le temps de travail et redistribue le pouvoir de régulation. En effet, les durées horaires ont

show abstract

“…With regard to pre-existing needs, people with medical pre-conditions or chronic diseases have experienced a shortage in routine healthcare treatments or medicament supply, due to the overburdened health system. Moreover, together with the elderly, they were defined as “risk groups” for severe COVID-19 pathologies (Jordan et al, 2020 ), and were strongly discouraged to leave their homes (Kushtanina & Vinel, 2020 ). From this new, pandemic-specific risk , a sudden demand for support with running basic errands has emerged among individuals from this group (Armitage & Nellums, 2020 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who Received Informal Social Support During the First COVID-19 Lockdown in Germany, and Who Did Not? The Role of Social Networks, Life Course and Pandemic-Specific Risks

Bertogg

Koos

2022

Soc Indic Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we study the receipt of informal support during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. The containment measures have had various, far-reaching consequences for the wellbeing of people, creating demands for economic, practical, and emotional support—even among individuals who hitherto were not in need of support. Existing research has shown substantial levels of informal support during the pandemic, often based on individuals’ existing social networks, but has predominantly taken the perspective of donors. In this article, we focus on the “demand” or recipient “side” of informal support, and ask: (1) Who receives which type of informal social support during the pandemic? (2) Who reports unmet need? (3) Which factors explain support receipt, unmet need and the type of support received? To explain patterns of receiving social support, we identify “classic” life course and “new” pandemic-specific risks and complement this perspective with individuals’ support potentials from their social networks. Empirically, we use data from an online survey, collected among a quota sample of the German population (n = 4,496) at the end of the first lockdown in late spring 2020. Our analysis shows that one in six respondents received social support, while only 3% report unmet need. Practical and emotional support are most widespread. Using logistic and multinomial logistic regression models our results show that social support in general and the type of support received can be explained by life course and pandemic risks, while unmet need is mainly a consequence of social network structure.

show abstract

‘Stay home’: age and gender frames and limits of residential family solidarities in the times of lockdown (a French example)

Cited by 8 publications

References 15 publications

The impact of the coronavirus crisis on European societies. What have we learnt and where do we go from here? – Introduction to the COVID volume

The impact of the coronavirus crisis on European societies. What have we learnt and where do we go from here? – Introduction to the COVID volume

Le surtravail ou la fragmentation? Transactions familiales et temps de travail en période de COVID‐19

Who Received Informal Social Support During the First COVID-19 Lockdown in Germany, and Who Did Not? The Role of Social Networks, Life Course and Pandemic-Specific Risks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About