1961
DOI: 10.1063/1.1717310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistics of Electron Multiplication

Abstract: The pulse-height distribution at the output of an electron multiplier structure for a single electron input has been calculated assuming a Poisson distribution at each stage. Graphs are given which illustrate the change in pulse-height distribution as a function of the number of stages. This has been done for interstage multiplications of 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors remarked that their results were inconsistent with observed data, thus rejecting the hypothesis of the Poisson distribution P being a good descriptor for the PMT electron multiplication process. In spite of this conclusion, other authors [7][8][9] consistently reported measurements which did agree with the calculations by Lombard et al [6] and attribute the discrepant results of other work to noise in their experimental set-up [9]. Using an exponential distribution to describe the electron multiplication at the dynodes, Prescott et al [10] obtained good agreement between calculated and measured spectra for some specific types of PMT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors remarked that their results were inconsistent with observed data, thus rejecting the hypothesis of the Poisson distribution P being a good descriptor for the PMT electron multiplication process. In spite of this conclusion, other authors [7][8][9] consistently reported measurements which did agree with the calculations by Lombard et al [6] and attribute the discrepant results of other work to noise in their experimental set-up [9]. Using an exponential distribution to describe the electron multiplication at the dynodes, Prescott et al [10] obtained good agreement between calculated and measured spectra for some specific types of PMT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Nevertheless, Breitenberger [5] reported that the electron multiplication variance measured using activated BaO + SrO dynodes is in fact larger than calculated when assuming a Poissonian secondary emission process Pðn; gÞ. Based on the same assumption, Lombard et al [6] derived the pulse height spectrum for cascades starting with single photoelectrons. The authors remarked that their results were inconsistent with observed data, thus rejecting the hypothesis of the Poisson distribution P being a good descriptor for the PMT electron multiplication process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7). The pulse height distribution of SER in PMT in the absence of external noise sources is mainly determined by multiplication statistics of the first dynode that is well described by Poisson distribution [16]. Poisson distribution with the average value of 7 to 9 is very close to that of Gaussian.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability distribution of the gain pu (M), along with its mean and variance, can be found in a variety of sources [45]- [48]. The excess noise factor is also well known 'Equation ( 2 ) in [45] should read…”
Section: Counting Statistics For the Single-carrier Superlattice mentioning
confidence: 99%