2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical significance of quantitative PCR

Abstract: Background: PCR has the potential to detect and precisely quantify specific DNA sequences, but it is not yet often used as a fully quantitative method. A number of data collection and processing strategies have been described for the implementation of quantitative PCR. However, they can be experimentally cumbersome, their relative performances have not been evaluated systematically, and they often remain poorly validated statistically and/or experimentally. In this study, we evaluated the performance of known … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
261
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 318 publications
(282 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
15
261
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using fluorescence dye SYBR green I, and each sample was analyzed in triplicate as described previously. 50 The following primers were used: GFP (forward, 5¢-ACATTATGCCGGACAAAGCC-3¢; reverse, 5¢-TTGTTT GGTAATGATCAGCAAGTTG-3¢) and the housekeeping GAPDH gene (forward primer, 5¢-CGACCCCTTCATTGACCTC-3¢; reverse primer, 5¢-CTCCACGACA TACTCAGCACC-3¢). The number of GFP transgenes integrated for each clone was estimated using the conserved housekeeping gene GAPDH as an internal reference.…”
Section: Generation Of Seap Producer Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using fluorescence dye SYBR green I, and each sample was analyzed in triplicate as described previously. 50 The following primers were used: GFP (forward, 5¢-ACATTATGCCGGACAAAGCC-3¢; reverse, 5¢-TTGTTT GGTAATGATCAGCAAGTTG-3¢) and the housekeeping GAPDH gene (forward primer, 5¢-CGACCCCTTCATTGACCTC-3¢; reverse primer, 5¢-CTCCACGACA TACTCAGCACC-3¢). The number of GFP transgenes integrated for each clone was estimated using the conserved housekeeping gene GAPDH as an internal reference.…”
Section: Generation Of Seap Producer Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of two copies of the primer-specific PinsEXO1 sequence in the P. insidiosum genome increased the chances of successful PCR amplification. The E value of 108% (acceptable range 90-110%) and the R 2 value of 0.994 (acceptable range w0.990) confirmed that this assay is highly efficient, and that the relationship between C q and DNA quantity is linear (Cankar et al, 2006;Karlen et al, 2007). The intra-assay (1.5-3.1%) and inter-assay (1.5%) CVs of the RT-PCR were relatively low (acceptable range v10%), reflecting the reproducibility of the assay (Cankar et al, 2006;Karlen et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The E value of 108% (acceptable range 90-110%) and the R 2 value of 0.994 (acceptable range w0.990) confirmed that this assay is highly efficient, and that the relationship between C q and DNA quantity is linear (Cankar et al, 2006;Karlen et al, 2007). The intra-assay (1.5-3.1%) and inter-assay (1.5%) CVs of the RT-PCR were relatively low (acceptable range v10%), reflecting the reproducibility of the assay (Cankar et al, 2006;Karlen et al, 2007). Taken together, the RT-PCR of PinsEXO1 was successfully developed for detecting and quantifying gDNA of P. insidiosum.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…While the PDV and GAPDH singleplex reactions had excellent precision, there was a slight loss of precision and PCR efficiency in duplex. Efficiency over 110% could suggest possible overamplification of the more abundant target in the duplex reaction or a decrease in the theoretical doubling of DNA in reaction amplification at the far ends of the range of detection (Bio-Rad Laboratories 2006; Applied Biosystems 2007; Karlen et al 2007). The kinetics related to the amplification of plasmid-derived RNA also differ from tissue-derived RNA as well as ds-DNA plasmid standards (Plaffl 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%