“…in large-area BJT, then both methods yield similar results, that is However, if the variations between individual spectra S i are spread over one decade or more, then the arithmetic averaging results in variation larger than the average [72], σ>S avg , it becomes impractical (because the noise is attributed to σ rather than to S avg ), and the geometric averaging is more suitable for sub-micrometer area devices, since the distribution of noise variation tends to log-normal distribution [28,29,79,80]. Therefore, many authors use geometric averaging [17,28,29,34,36,66,67,79,80,81,82]. Worth mentioning, it is empirically observed that the noise variations are better described by log-normal distribution, and substantial work is expected to explain the origin of this empirical observation [79,80].…”