2005
DOI: 10.1049/el:20052372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical BSIM model for MOSFET 1∕f noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of this model can be found in [2]. The bias independent model accurately predicts the device area dependence of noise variability as shown in [2]. In the following figure, we show close-in phase noise measurements, as well simulation results with the biasindependent statistical 1/f noise model.…”
Section: Mosfet 1/f Noise Statistics and Vco Phase Noisementioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The details of this model can be found in [2]. The bias independent model accurately predicts the device area dependence of noise variability as shown in [2]. In the following figure, we show close-in phase noise measurements, as well simulation results with the biasindependent statistical 1/f noise model.…”
Section: Mosfet 1/f Noise Statistics and Vco Phase Noisementioning
confidence: 52%
“…This effectively scales the noise power regardless of gate or drain bias. The details of this model can be found in [2]. The bias independent model accurately predicts the device area dependence of noise variability as shown in [2].…”
Section: Mosfet 1/f Noise Statistics and Vco Phase Noisementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in large-area BJT, then both methods yield similar results, that is However, if the variations between individual spectra S i are spread over one decade or more, then the arithmetic averaging results in variation larger than the average [72], σ>S avg , it becomes impractical (because the noise is attributed to σ rather than to S avg ), and the geometric averaging is more suitable for sub-micrometer area devices, since the distribution of noise variation tends to log-normal distribution [28,29,79,80]. Therefore, many authors use geometric averaging [17,28,29,34,36,66,67,79,80,81,82]. Worth mentioning, it is empirically observed that the noise variations are better described by log-normal distribution, and substantial work is expected to explain the origin of this empirical observation [79,80].…”
Section: Numerical Methods For Averagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, the amplitude of the transformed data by F(x) is presented where x is the collected voltage signal. Since the existence of flick noise (also called 1/f noise, in the frequency zone between 0-500 Hz) can affect the signal analysis of tree defect, the signals in this range are eliminated (Erturk et al 2005(Erturk et al , 2007. Figure 7 shows the amplitude of signals in the frequency domain for intact region and defect regions with different locations.…”
Section: Detectable Thickness Of Near Surface Defect In Trunk Using Acoustic-laser Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%