1996
DOI: 10.1016/0926-860x(95)00315-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stationary and transient kinetics of the high temperature water-gas shift reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the models in [2,7,13,15] and [22], the activation energy E a is higher. In these approaches, the activation energy values varied between 95 and 118 kJ mol −1 .…”
Section: The Improved Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the models in [2,7,13,15] and [22], the activation energy E a is higher. In these approaches, the activation energy values varied between 95 and 118 kJ mol −1 .…”
Section: The Improved Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In addition, the presented value of factor a shows that the influence of the CO partial pressure is also higher (1.77 in this work versus about 1.0 in [2,13], and [22]). This could be explained by the low operating pressure in this work and, therefore, an even lower adsorption of CO on the catalyst surface.…”
Section: The Improved Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported activation energies for the WGSR over magnetite/chromium oxide catalyst are in the range from 40 to 150 kJ/mol. 10,11 The lower activation energy obtained here, 74.7 kJ/mol, is believed to be caused by diffusional limitations in the catalyst particles as explained by Keiski et al 10 To investigate the reaction orders with respect to CO(g) and H 2 O(g), the CO 2 photoacoustic signals were measured at various partial pressures of CO and H 2 O. Figure 4 demonstrates the CO 2 photoacoustic signals measured at various Pco's at 300 o C and the reaction order with respect to CO determined from the reaction rates is 0.93.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we only use Power Law (PL) model to describe the kinetics as it is the simplest empirical rate expression, which disdain any mechanism such as redox or Langmuir-Hinshelwood (LH). Likewise, several researchers have been reported using this kinetic model for high temperature WGSR, e.g., [11] and [12]. The PL model is given by:…”
Section: Wgsr Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%