2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Static and dynamic wetting behaviour of ionic liquids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6-7) results from the difference between the work of adhesion (W SL ) and the work of cohesion (W C ) inside the liquid. It can be defined as the work per unit area necessary to separate isothermally a homogeneous liquid [17].…”
Section: Wetting Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6-7) results from the difference between the work of adhesion (W SL ) and the work of cohesion (W C ) inside the liquid. It can be defined as the work per unit area necessary to separate isothermally a homogeneous liquid [17].…”
Section: Wetting Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Castejon et al [16] made a simulation with a wide range of typical cations and anions obtaining different ILs with good surface-wetting properties on silica, with contact angle values far below 90°. Delcheva et al [17] did a literature review on ionic liquid wettability finding that issues such as water content and halide impurities in combination with type of material and surface finish provoke uncertainty in the role of the ion chemistry. Carrera et al [18] found that a proper combination of ion structures is fundamental in order to modify the contact angle on Teflon and glass.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10] Thea pproaches that have been proposed to reduce the solid-solid interfacial resistances on the cathode side include surface modification of electrode particles with at hin film of solid electrolyte, [11] synthesis of nanosized electrode particles to increase the contact areas with solid electrolytes, [12] dielectric modification at the electrode-electrolyte interface, [13] fabrication of thin-film batteries, [14] design of composite electrolytes with polymer and ceramic materials, [15,16] and construction of ab attery with as ingle component. [18][19][20][21] Thel ow ionic conductivity (ca. [18][19][20][21] Thel ow ionic conductivity (ca.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing the results obtained, it is possible to discern a trend for all surfaces studied: [P 66614 ][(iC8) 2 PO 2 ] and [P 66614 ][BEHP] had the highest values, thus having the best wettability on hydrophobic surfaces. Furthermore, the differences between ILs were more noticeable in the most hydrophobic surfaces (CrN and ZrN), thus making a comparison more difficult for the less hydrophobic one Table 7.…”
Section: Contact Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 One of the main advantages of working with ILs is the possibility of easily adapting their properties with small variations in the chemical composition, thus having a huge potential for engineering applications. 2 This fact may be used as a tool for self-tuning the ILs with multiple and useful application possibilities by changing physicochemical properties, such as density, melting point, viscosity, conductivity, or surface tension. 9 For instance, water miscibility of ILs is usually controlled by the anion, although the cation can also affect the hydrophobicity of the substance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%