2015
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.52734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the art paper Evolution of the term and definition of dysplasia of the hip – a review of the literature

Abstract: There is no consensus on the definition of dysplasia of the hip (DH). Past and present concepts used to describe DH do not form a complete view of the pathology. Moreover, some authors still present the disease as congenital, not developmental. This prompted authors to analyze the evolution of the definition of DH. Based on the biomedical databases 500 articles and books in the field of hip dysplasia were found and analyzed. Fifteen definitions of hip dysplasia met inclusion criteria, subsequently were analyze… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
16
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…1 There is much diversity in the studies regarding the definition of DDH itself, as already mentioned in the introduction, and on aspects such as diagnostic methods, classification, among others. 2 In addition, the literature is very scarce regarding the possible sex differences concerning the epidemiology, risk factors and prognosis of evolution. In 2010, the International Committee for Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommended the inclusion of representative populations in all clinical studies, including gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 There is much diversity in the studies regarding the definition of DDH itself, as already mentioned in the introduction, and on aspects such as diagnostic methods, classification, among others. 2 In addition, the literature is very scarce regarding the possible sex differences concerning the epidemiology, risk factors and prognosis of evolution. In 2010, the International Committee for Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommended the inclusion of representative populations in all clinical studies, including gender.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades there has been considerable evolution in the diagnosis and treatment protocols of DDH and many epidemiological aspects as well as risk factors have been studied. [1][2][3][4] It is known, for example, that there is a prevalence of unilateral disease and the most affected side is the left side, the white race and the female sex are more frequently associated with the condition, and the risk factors include pelvic presentation, oligohydramnios, among others. [4][5] However, little is known about the characteristics of DDH in males and if there are sex differences in the characteristics of the disease, since there is a shortage of studies that highlight them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hip dysplasia describes an abnormally formed hip joint, most frequently a shallow or upward sloping acetabulum 19. Most commonly, though not exclusively, adult dysplasia results from undiagnosed developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).…”
Section: Young Adult Hip Pathologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…kształtem i zaburzoną orientacją przestrzenną głowy kości udowej lub/i panewki [5]. Termin ten określa różne zmiany w stawie biodrowym takie jak podwichnięcie, przemieszczenie lub niestabilność [6][7][8][9]. Częstość rozpoznawania klinicznych objawów DDH jest bardzo zróżnicowana i waha się od 0.04%-16.8% [10].…”
Section: Słowa Kluczoweunclassified
“…Podkreślano również, że utrzymanie prawidłowego i symetrycznego zakresu ruchu w stawach biodrowych jest niezbędne, by uniknąć nieprawidłowego trójpłaszczyznowego ustawienia kompleksu lędźwiowo-miedniczno-biodrowego [25]. Powyższe badania wskazują na istnienie pewnych związków hip such as sublocation, dislocation or instability [6][7][8][9]. The frequency at which clinical symptoms of DDH are diagnosed may vary from 0.04% to16.8% [10].…”
Section: Słowa Kluczoweunclassified