2017
DOI: 10.1108/hff-10-2016-0380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State of the art of thermal characterization of electronic components using computational fluid dynamic tools

Abstract: Purpose Latest Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFDs) tools allow modeling more finely the conjugate thermo-fluidic behavior of a single electronic component mounted on a Printed Wiring Board (PWB). A realistic three-dimensional representation of a large set of electric copper traces of its composite structure is henceforth achievable. The purpose of this study is to confront the predictions of the fully detailed numerical model of an electronic board to a set of experiment results to assess their relevance. De… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 gives the adjusted thermal properties of the calibrated numerical model of the board substrate. Numerical simulations were performed using four distinct pieces of computational fluid dynamic software [1,19] and demonstrates, whatever the thermal test board, a very good agreement between the experimental measurements and numerical results on the R JA computation, as reported in Table 4, for the 2s2p PCB. It occurs that the discrepancy of the numerical model (R N JA ) in comparison to measurements (R M JA ) is lower than 2%.…”
Section: Reduced-order Modal Modelmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Table 3 gives the adjusted thermal properties of the calibrated numerical model of the board substrate. Numerical simulations were performed using four distinct pieces of computational fluid dynamic software [1,19] and demonstrates, whatever the thermal test board, a very good agreement between the experimental measurements and numerical results on the R JA computation, as reported in Table 4, for the 2s2p PCB. It occurs that the discrepancy of the numerical model (R N JA ) in comparison to measurements (R M JA ) is lower than 2%.…”
Section: Reduced-order Modal Modelmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…On the other hand, the numerical modelling of a fine three-dimensional representation of complex multiple heating sources package is today easier as well as Printed Circuit Board on which it is mounted [3]. That accurate modelling allows a new way to calibrate the thermal behaviour of a component from experiment and then derive an appropriate thermal network.…”
Section: Dynamical Compact Thermal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those surrogate models have the benefits of correctly predicting the thermal path of the packages, within a good tolerance, without the need for a full geometry description. objective function (3). Its form is expressed as a weighted-sum equation:…”
Section: Dynamical Compact Thermal Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%