2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2004.00074.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Formation and the Historiography of Early Modern England

Abstract: The history of the state was once at the core of academic history and university curricula. In English history, the revolution of 1649 was said to be of epochal significance and influential analyses of its causes sought to tie together disparate fields of study in a single explanation. Over the last thirty years, however, such accounts have been heavily criticised and, partly as a consequence, the historiography of Stuart England became much more fragmented. Recent histories of ‘state formation’ however, promi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Braddick spreekt in zijn werk over de staatsvorming onder de Tudors en Stuarts uitdrukkelijk over de staatsvorming in Engeland, niet van de vorming van een Engelse staat, juist omdat die staat, met zijn centrum in Londen, ook macht uitoefende in Schotland, Wales, Ierland en Noord-Amerika. 132 Vanaf 1559 kan men stellen dat, analoog aan de redenering van 136 Karel keerde in 1531 terug naar de Nederlanden, waar hij de bestaande Grote Raad splitste in een Raad van State en een Geheime Raad en de drie raden -ook de Raad van Financiën -een plaats gaf naast de nieuwe, jonge landvoogdes Maria van Hongarije. 137 De 'collaterale raden' hadden het licht gezien.…”
Section: De Nederlandse Context: Het 'Voorspel' Van De Nederlandse Opunclassified
“…Braddick spreekt in zijn werk over de staatsvorming onder de Tudors en Stuarts uitdrukkelijk over de staatsvorming in Engeland, niet van de vorming van een Engelse staat, juist omdat die staat, met zijn centrum in Londen, ook macht uitoefende in Schotland, Wales, Ierland en Noord-Amerika. 132 Vanaf 1559 kan men stellen dat, analoog aan de redenering van 136 Karel keerde in 1531 terug naar de Nederlanden, waar hij de bestaande Grote Raad splitste in een Raad van State en een Geheime Raad en de drie raden -ook de Raad van Financiën -een plaats gaf naast de nieuwe, jonge landvoogdes Maria van Hongarije. 137 De 'collaterale raden' hadden het licht gezien.…”
Section: De Nederlandse Context: Het 'Voorspel' Van De Nederlandse Opunclassified
“…Political power was, thus, shared in a complicated 'network of agencies' by stake-holders drawn from the spectacularly rich to the almost poor. 21 The crown's freedom of action in coordinating this governing apparatus was limited by the expectations of the governed, by its dependence upon local office-holders as partners in maintaining order, and by the accountability of local governors to community expectations about harmony and neighbourliness.…”
Section: The Restoration In Recent Historiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 This was partly a xenophobic reaction no doubt, in 1612 Chamberlain observing that 'here have happened two or three accidents of late very unluckely, that make some boyling twixt the Scottes and our nation '. 18 Ireland was more problematic. Brown's conclusions that there was remarkably little anglicization of Scottish nobles or integration of them into English society demonstrate the underlying friction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Neil Cuddy's article on the antagonism stimulated by the creation of a Scottish-dominated bedchamber links this discontent to wider English resistance to fuller union, as does the work of Jenny Wormald and Keith Brown on the simmering anti-Scottish sentiment at court. 19 The working relationship that existed between the Catholic Old English elite in the Pale and the English crown was undermined by the stridently Protestant Elizabethan conquest from the 1570s, the Old English increasingly looking towards Gaelic elites for support. 7 Similarly, the English parliament's debates of 1607 over the naturalization of Scotsmen indicated considerable English resistance to Scottish intrusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%