2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Starch grain characterization of Prosopis chilensis (Mol.) Stuntz and P. flexuosa DC, and the analysis of their archaeological remains in Andean South America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
41

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
23
0
41
Order By: Relevance
“…Species similarities are reflected in the pod starch grains. For example, a systematic study showed that there are no differences in starch between P. chilensis and P. flexuosa (35). Algarrobo is ubiquitous in pre-Colombian Peru, most often as wood for fuel or construction (30,36) or more rarely for seeds and edible pods (34).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Species similarities are reflected in the pod starch grains. For example, a systematic study showed that there are no differences in starch between P. chilensis and P. flexuosa (35). Algarrobo is ubiquitous in pre-Colombian Peru, most often as wood for fuel or construction (30,36) or more rarely for seeds and edible pods (34).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algarrobo is ubiquitous in pre-Colombian Peru, most often as wood for fuel or construction (30,36) or more rarely for seeds and edible pods (34). A long history of algarrobo use occurs in Argentina, beginning 10,000 years ago (35). In Peru, less is understood regarding prehistoric consumption of algarrobo pods, which are today ground into flour to make a syrup, algarrobina, or for drinks, such as fermented chicha de algarrobo.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taxonomic identification of archaeological starch was based on published reference works and a preliminary comparative study (9,10,15,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). Reference taxa include Andean pseudocereal, seed, legume, fruit, and geophyte crops like chenopods, amaranth, maize, beans, chiles, manioc, achira, oca, ulluco, and potato (9,10,15,16,23,25,28,(30)(31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Al respecto, resulta factible pensar en una posible sobreestima de este recurso, la cual puede deberse a influencias externas más que a la realidad prehispánica (ver López 2017 para una mayor discusión del tema). En primer lugar, se considera que la alta presencia de macrorrestos de algarrobo en numerosos sitios del NOA (Capparelli y Lema 2011;Giovannetti et al 2008;Oliszewski 1999) pudo influir en considerarlo como básico para la subsistencia en la región Centro. Paralelamente, la información etnobotánica obtenida a lo largo del NOA, NEA y COA refuerza el papel del algarrobo como un alimento tradicional y con raigambre de marcada profundidad (Capparelli 2007;Sciammaro 2015).…”
Section: Discusión De Las Evidenciasunclassified