2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2005.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards for digital photography in cranio-maxillo-facial surgery – Part I: Basic views and guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
114
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
114
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct measurements and two-dimensional photography are state of the art for craniofacial anthropometry, 9 although their limitations are well-known. 1,10 The interest in overcoming the limitations of these techniques led to the development of numerous 3D scanning devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct measurements and two-dimensional photography are state of the art for craniofacial anthropometry, 9 although their limitations are well-known. 1,10 The interest in overcoming the limitations of these techniques led to the development of numerous 3D scanning devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients underwent digital photography. 8,29 with standard views (Full face front, Oblique, and Profile; Submental vertical and oblique views and supracranial view). The photographs were taken at admission and 48 hrs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D imaging. 2D images were taken according to the protocol of Schaaf et al (2006) and Ettorre et al (2006), identifying focal points on the frontal and right lateral areas of the face. Both images were taken 3 times, with the head in a natural position, horizontal view and with the bipupilar plane parallel to the floor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%