2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b07629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardizing Nanomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also restricted to a target population and conclusions can hardly be extrapolated. In the literature, the investigation of nanoparticles in patients' samples is rare and when it exists it is limited to electron microscopy observations that do not allow a complete physicochemical characterization of the 13014:2012Mulvaney et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also restricted to a target population and conclusions can hardly be extrapolated. In the literature, the investigation of nanoparticles in patients' samples is rare and when it exists it is limited to electron microscopy observations that do not allow a complete physicochemical characterization of the 13014:2012Mulvaney et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other techniques that are starting to become part of the characterization scheme of NPs prior to use in humans are dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, gel electrophoresis, and ζ-potential analysis. However, there are no standardized characterization requirements of NPs 26 prior to use in humans, and this must be a focus for nanomedicine applications. The main reason is that the biodistribution and interaction of NPs with proteins is strongly size- and surface-dependent, and thus, in a heterogeneous sample, many NPs will distribute differently and may exhibit undesired effects or even toxicity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical reactivity depends on the types and geometry of the surface facets, but it is difficult to provide statistically reliable information on the surface facet structure of a large number of rods today. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies are inherently limited to individual rods; conventional X‐ray scattering does not allow us to distinguish surface facets from the bulk ones, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) usually cannot provide atomic resolution on nanoparticles …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%