2015 IEEE 4th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/gcce.2015.7398553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standard cell implementation of buskeeper PUF with symmetric inverters and neighboring cells for passing randomness tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2), a good level of randomness of PUF value is easily obtained. 26) The buskeeper PUF is composed of complementary devices, and does not change its state after the power is turned on. The static power consumption of the buskeeper PUF is small in comparison to that of the non-complementary PUF implementation 41) or a ring oscillator PUF implementation, which consume dynamic operation power.…”
Section: Buskeeper Pufmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2), a good level of randomness of PUF value is easily obtained. 26) The buskeeper PUF is composed of complementary devices, and does not change its state after the power is turned on. The static power consumption of the buskeeper PUF is small in comparison to that of the non-complementary PUF implementation 41) or a ring oscillator PUF implementation, which consume dynamic operation power.…”
Section: Buskeeper Pufmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SRAM PUF is the most fundamental PUF 23,24) that exploits the power-on initial value of the latch circuit, which strongly depends on the process variability. The construction of a buskeeper PUF 25,26) and a D Flip-Flop PUF 27) is similar to that of an SRAM PUF. Improved structures of the SRAM PUF using additional circuits have also been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24) Generally, the intermediate gate input voltage causes significant through-currents, resulting in a severe static leakage current. Previously, evaluated the feasibility of security components 25,26) using the OTFT logic circuits at V dd = 3.3 V with the complementary gate structure. 27) These security components called buskeeper physically unclonable functions generate random IDs unique to each chip, utilizing the power-on initial value of the buskeeper cell.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, that is difficult for a ring oscillator PUF because it requires measurement at several times to get frequency data once. Therefore, we began to investigate a buskeeper circuit 13,14) instead of the ring oscillator. In a previous study about thermal stability, we have reported that an organic buskeeper PUF keeps its ID value even after annealing for 25 h. 15) In this article, we expand the data on thermal stability up to 97 h and discuss a failure mode of an organic buskeeper PUF device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%