2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand structure and growth of Abies magnifica responded to five thinning levels in northeastern California, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6). Clearly, DBH frequencies were bell-shaped even for all plots including control, in contrast to the finding in young red fir (Zhang and Oliver, 2006). Data are not presented for two locations-treatments were unreplicated at Little Glass Mountain and only two periods were analyzed for the density treatments at LaTour.…”
Section: Stand Structurementioning
confidence: 84%
“…6). Clearly, DBH frequencies were bell-shaped even for all plots including control, in contrast to the finding in young red fir (Zhang and Oliver, 2006). Data are not presented for two locations-treatments were unreplicated at Little Glass Mountain and only two periods were analyzed for the density treatments at LaTour.…”
Section: Stand Structurementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Stand density management has long been recognized as one of the principal silvicultural interventions offering forest managers an opportunity to optimize growth and yield (Zeide, 2004;Pretzsch, 2005), regulate tree size distributions (Landsberg et al, 2005;Zhang & Oliver, 2006), or improve the quality of forest products (Macdonald & Hubert, 2002). Knowledge of the stand densityÁgrowth relationships has direct implications for forest management decision-making since forest models for prediction of stand growth and thinning responses are based on the understanding of this relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In native groves, management objectives revolve around cohort establishment and canopy recruitment following regeneration failures related to fire suppression (York et al 2012). Controlled density experiments have provided both basic biological insight and guidance for designing management prescriptions for most commercial tree species, including all of those co-occurring with giant sequoia (e.g., Speechly and Helms 1985, O'Hara 1988, Cochran and Barrett 1999, Zhang and Oliver 2006). Because it is not widely managed as a commercial species, however, such insights for giant sequoia are limited despite the relevance for both commercial and restoration applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%