2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of stand densities on stand dynamics in white fir (Abies concolor) forests in northeast California, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More intense growth was noted in non-thinned control stands [43][44][45]. Due to intensive thinning, the stand volume increment was smaller than in control stands [19,20,46], whereas due to low intensity management, the influence of thinning was weak or none [46,47]. Some studies show a complete lack of influence of thinning on either stand growth [21,48] or biomass production [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More intense growth was noted in non-thinned control stands [43][44][45]. Due to intensive thinning, the stand volume increment was smaller than in control stands [19,20,46], whereas due to low intensity management, the influence of thinning was weak or none [46,47]. Some studies show a complete lack of influence of thinning on either stand growth [21,48] or biomass production [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fire acts as a bottleneck for tree establishment (Higgins et al, 2000) but individual trees that successfully escape the fire trap might benefit from fire because fire reduces the size of their competitors and thereby the asymmetry in competitive interactions. Although density-dependent self-thinning effects have been observed in forest systems (Niklas et al, 2003;Bagchi, 2007;McCarthy & Weetman, 2007;Zhang et al, 2007), they have only rarely been investigated in savannas (MacGregor & O'Connor, 2002) and seldom in the context of fire. Hély et al (2006) and Hickler et al (2006) report that the fire submodels of DGVMs (Thonicke et al, 2001;Sitch et al, 2003) are major sources of uncertainty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heavy thinning was usually associated with a lower stand volume increment than that found on unthinned control plots (del Río et al 2008;Mäkinen and Isomäki 2004a;Valinger et al 2000). For light thinning, weak or no correlations were found (del Río et al 2008;Zhang et al 2007). Other studies found that, immediately after thinning, there was a decrease in stand volume growth, typically lasting approximately 10 years, levelling off after this period (Egnell and Ulvcrona 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%