2011
DOI: 10.1080/02827581.2011.611477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Density–growth relationships in thinned and unthinned Norway spruce and Scots pine stands in Norway

Abstract: Drawing on national forest inventory data representing a wide range of stand densities, site qualities, ages, and management practices in Norway, this study (1) analyzed the stand densityÁgrowth relationships in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) dominated stands and (2) evaluated the influence of site index, stand age, and thinning on the densityÁgrowth relationships. We developed nonlinear growth models that described the periodic annual basal area or volume incremen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to intensive thinning, the stand volume increment was smaller than in control stands [19,20,46], whereas due to low intensity management, the influence of thinning was weak or none [46,47]. Some studies show a complete lack of influence of thinning on either stand growth [21,48] or biomass production [49]. It was found that, immediately after thinning, there was a decrease in stand volume growth, typically lasting approximately 10 years, levelling off after this period [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to intensive thinning, the stand volume increment was smaller than in control stands [19,20,46], whereas due to low intensity management, the influence of thinning was weak or none [46,47]. Some studies show a complete lack of influence of thinning on either stand growth [21,48] or biomass production [49]. It was found that, immediately after thinning, there was a decrease in stand volume growth, typically lasting approximately 10 years, levelling off after this period [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that, immediately after thinning, there was a decrease in stand volume growth, typically lasting approximately 10 years, levelling off after this period [50]. In addition, the remaining trees had a greater volume increment if thinning was more intense [44,48,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies found that, immediately after thinning, there was a decrease in stand volume growth, typically lasting approximately 10 years, levelling off after this period (Egnell and Ulvcrona 2015). In addition, greater tree volume growth occurred in the remaining trees if thinning were heavier (Gizachew and Brunner 2011;Kuliešis et al 2010;Moulinier et al 2015). Notably, however, the growth of those trees that remain after heavy thinning or those grown at an initial low density may have poorer wood quality than trees grown at higher densities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These results suggest the fast recovery potential of M. glyptostroboides plantation after thinning. However, many short-term studies have suggested that thinning would reduce the tree density, leading to the decline of the stand productivity [31, 32]. Nevertheless, thinning would improve the light environment within the forest and facilitate the growth of understory vegetation, which would partially remedy the carbon storage removed by the cut trees after thinning [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%