2000
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225x-29.1.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stand Conditions Associated with Roundheaded Pine Beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Infestations in Arizona and Utah

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(12 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second classification model found a 72% probability of infestation when ponderosa pine basal area was >24.1 m 2 /ha. In the Pine Valley Mountains of Utah, stand density index was significantly greater in infested plots than in uninfested plots (Negrón et al, 2000). Classification models indicated a probability of infestation of 93% with a growth rate 0.66 cm and 23% with >0.66 cm.…”
Section: Risk and Hazard Rating Modelsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A second classification model found a 72% probability of infestation when ponderosa pine basal area was >24.1 m 2 /ha. In the Pine Valley Mountains of Utah, stand density index was significantly greater in infested plots than in uninfested plots (Negrón et al, 2000). Classification models indicated a probability of infestation of 93% with a growth rate 0.66 cm and 23% with >0.66 cm.…”
Section: Risk and Hazard Rating Modelsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the Pinaleño Mountains of Arizona, plots infested with roundheaded pine beetle had significantly higher stand densities compared to uninfested plots (Negrón et al, 2000). A classification model indicated a 60% probability of infestation when periodic growth ratio (ratio of most recent 5-year growth to that of the previous 5 years) was 1.14.…”
Section: Risk and Hazard Rating Modelsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Anthropogenic and natural changes to canopy structure, such as selective logging (Asner et al 2004), fire (Chambers et al 2005), regional climate change (Breshears et al 2005), or bark beetle infestations (Negrón et al 2000), strongly affect the microscale canopy structure by changing the stand density, leaf density distribution, and distribution of stem sizes. These disturbances create a structural pattern at the length scale of a single tree crown, but such small-scale changes to canopy structure can extend over very large spatial domains (e.g., Asner et al 2005).…”
Section: Level 3: Effects Of Tree-scale Heterogeneity On the Spatial mentioning
confidence: 99%