2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staff eye lens dose in interventional radiology and cardiology in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10,13,14] For measuring the correlation with the whole body dose, the Hp(0,07) is seen as the optimal measurable parameter [9,15]. Various studies have already investigated this correlation in the past [11][12][13]16,17]. They however show varying results, which is likely due to variation in staff positioning in the scanning room, orientation and usage of the C-arm as well as orientation, angle dependence and energy dependence of the dosimeters used [11][12][13]16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[10,13,14] For measuring the correlation with the whole body dose, the Hp(0,07) is seen as the optimal measurable parameter [9,15]. Various studies have already investigated this correlation in the past [11][12][13]16,17]. They however show varying results, which is likely due to variation in staff positioning in the scanning room, orientation and usage of the C-arm as well as orientation, angle dependence and energy dependence of the dosimeters used [11][12][13]16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have already investigated this correlation in the past [11][12][13]16,17]. They however show varying results, which is likely due to variation in staff positioning in the scanning room, orientation and usage of the C-arm as well as orientation, angle dependence and energy dependence of the dosimeters used [11][12][13]16,17]. Because of these variations, hospitals should preferably establish a correlation between eye lens dose and whole body dose which is representative for their own setting in which the interventional fluoroscopy procedures are performed [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%