Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stacking n-type layers: Effective route towards stable, efficient and hysteresis-free planar perovskite solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bilayer gives a large ΔG (free energy difference) value as well as a defect‐free physical contact, which can enhance electron extraction, resulting better device performance of 21.1% in reverse scan with high V oc of 1.2 V. Compared with single SnO 2 layer or single a‐TiO 2 layer, it showed better stable‐output and hysteresis phenomenon (Figure b,c) . Zhong and co‐workers also formed a stacked layer of TiO 2 (spray pyrolytic method)/SnO 2 (spin‐coating SnO 2 colloidal solution) on FTO substrate as n‐type layer to reduce pinholes and help hole blocking between perovskite layer and substrate, and they got PCE of 18.03%.…”
Section: Modification Of Sno2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bilayer gives a large ΔG (free energy difference) value as well as a defect‐free physical contact, which can enhance electron extraction, resulting better device performance of 21.1% in reverse scan with high V oc of 1.2 V. Compared with single SnO 2 layer or single a‐TiO 2 layer, it showed better stable‐output and hysteresis phenomenon (Figure b,c) . Zhong and co‐workers also formed a stacked layer of TiO 2 (spray pyrolytic method)/SnO 2 (spin‐coating SnO 2 colloidal solution) on FTO substrate as n‐type layer to reduce pinholes and help hole blocking between perovskite layer and substrate, and they got PCE of 18.03%.…”
Section: Modification Of Sno2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caruso and co‐workers also showed that the SnO 2 nanosheet ETL combined with C 60 showed better storage device stability in ambient conditions compared with the TiO 2 nanosheet . Zhong and co‐workers used TiO 2 /SnO 2 bilayer as ETL and the devices exhibit good long‐term storage stability and even in harsh environment it showed much better performance than the single ETL layer …”
Section: Hysteresis and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22,27] Consequently, SnO 2 is an ideal candidate to address this issue because of its larger bandgap. [22,27] Consequently, SnO 2 is an ideal candidate to address this issue because of its larger bandgap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the device based on SnO 2 fabricated by spin-coating is not reproducible. [27] In fact, these studies are not comprehensive and there are a lot of significant issues on double-layer architecture such as interface and stability, which need to be addressed. Based on SnO 2 (fabricated using nanocrystal or solution)/TiO 2 ETL some groups reported PCE over 20%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Owing to its simple structure and fabrication process, planar PSCs are more feasiblef or commercialization. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Especially SnO 2 has exhibited great potential because of its low cost, easy scale-up syntheses and ultraviolet (UV) light resistance. [6][7][8][9][10][11] Especially SnO 2 has exhibited great potential because of its low cost, easy scale-up syntheses and ultraviolet (UV) light resistance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%