1978
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210450125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stacking fault energy and ionicity of cubic III–V compounds

Abstract: Using weak beam electron microscopy the stacking fault energy (SFE) of III‐V compounds is determined by measuring the dissociation width of edge dislocations. The SFE corrected for the lattice parameters is given in meV/atom for GaAs, GaP, GaSb, InAs, InP, and InSb. As expected there is a strong correlation of the SFE with the ionicity of the bond. The different plasticity of the compounds is traced back to different dislocation velocities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
91
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(7 reference statements)
5
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a resolution of a few nanometers allowed for a determination of Burgers vectors [4], the weak beam technique pushed TEM resolution towards one nm and revealed splitting of dislocations into partials [5][6][7], High Resolution TEM allowed for imaging of dislocation cores with near atomic resolution (~ 0.2 nm) [8], kinks on individual partial dislocations could be studied in a plane view configuration by imaging with forbidden reflections [9], and Scanning TEM in combination with Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) accesses impurity segregation at dislocation cores and their local electronic structure [10]. Resolution in electron microscopy has reached by now sub Ångstrom values [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a resolution of a few nanometers allowed for a determination of Burgers vectors [4], the weak beam technique pushed TEM resolution towards one nm and revealed splitting of dislocations into partials [5][6][7], High Resolution TEM allowed for imaging of dislocation cores with near atomic resolution (~ 0.2 nm) [8], kinks on individual partial dislocations could be studied in a plane view configuration by imaging with forbidden reflections [9], and Scanning TEM in combination with Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS) accesses impurity segregation at dislocation cores and their local electronic structure [10]. Resolution in electron microscopy has reached by now sub Ångstrom values [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ϭ32.5 GPa, ϭ0.31, b ϭ4 Å, and ␥ϭ55 mJ/m 2 , 14 we repeat the plot with changing L. In this way, L M ϭ180 Å is determined. Consequently, if the distance between the two upper partials is less than L M , the interaction takes place.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we found the distorted InP crystal growth could not be solved by lowering the growth rates. In addition to the growth-induced planar defects mentioned above, low SF energy of InP favors the dissociation of threading dislocations into SFs [24]. The 3.7% lattice mismatch between InP and Ge introduces high density of threading dislocations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3.7% lattice mismatch between InP and Ge introduces high density of threading dislocations. Some of them dissociate into pairs of partial threading dislocations bounded by SFs [24]. The dissociation of threading dislocations into SFs is determined by thermodynamics and occurs in trenches of both orientations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%