1998
DOI: 10.1006/jare.1998.0425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable states in relation to grazing in Patagonia: a 10-year experimental trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
37
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects of grazing are often positive where the rangeland vegetation has coevolved with grazing and is adapted to it (Milchunas and Lauenroth 1993). Local adaptations or changes in plant community composition may prevent degradation; even when macroclimatic conditions are relatively stable (Mwalyosi 1992, Oliva et al 1998, Hostert et al 2003, Geerken and Ilaiwi 2004. Regardless of the indicator used, a transparent definition of degradation is vital to conduct a meaningful assessment of the non-equilibrium concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of grazing are often positive where the rangeland vegetation has coevolved with grazing and is adapted to it (Milchunas and Lauenroth 1993). Local adaptations or changes in plant community composition may prevent degradation; even when macroclimatic conditions are relatively stable (Mwalyosi 1992, Oliva et al 1998, Hostert et al 2003, Geerken and Ilaiwi 2004. Regardless of the indicator used, a transparent definition of degradation is vital to conduct a meaningful assessment of the non-equilibrium concept.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, experimental evaluation of the effect of improved management on tussock loss is limited, because the process is slow. Ten years of controlled grazing at 3 stocking rates failed to show a decrease in tussock grass cover at the community scale when grazed at high intensity (Oliva et al 1998). Direct observation of the process may require longer and clearly nonviable experiments or unrealistically high stocking rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stocking rate studies from different locations in the south-western United States have indicated that a conservative stocking involving 30-35% use of average forage production is a reliable way to increase forage production and improve vegetation composition on degraded rangelands (Holechek et al, 1994(Holechek et al, , 1999Winder et al, 2000). Similarly, Oliva et al (1998) have demonstrated for the Patagonia Argentina that plant communities under moderate stocking did not lose diversity or highly palatable species after a 10-year grazing trial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%