1990
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900315)65:6<1321::aid-cncr2820650612>3.0.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Squamous cell carcinoma antigen in the diagnosis and treatment follow-up of oral and facial squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: The squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen was determined by radioimmunoassay in the serum of 40 untreated patients with SCC of the oromaxillofacial region. The mean (+/- SEM) serum concentration for these patients (3.8 +/- 0.8 ng/ml) was significantly higher than that of 52 disease-free patients coming to routine postoperative care (1.2 +/- 0.1 ng/ml) and of 74 healthy controls (1.1 +/- 0.07 ng/ml). Using a arbitrary limit of 2.2 ng/ml, pathologic serum levels of SCC were observed in 15 (38%) of 40 untreated p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now numerous tumour-derived substances have been evaluated as diagnostic indicators of tumour presence in untreated patients, but, with few exceptions, most of these direct markers proved to be only of limited clinical usefulness owing to extremely high biological variabilities, limited specificities for malignant proliferation, and low sensitivities for detecting early tumour stages. Particularly for SCC-HN no sufficiently sensitive non-invasive tumour marker was available until now (Fischbach et al, 1990). Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-A) was considered a promising candidate in aiding diagnosis and monitoring of patients with SCC-HN, but the diagnostic performance finally turned out to be poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Until now numerous tumour-derived substances have been evaluated as diagnostic indicators of tumour presence in untreated patients, but, with few exceptions, most of these direct markers proved to be only of limited clinical usefulness owing to extremely high biological variabilities, limited specificities for malignant proliferation, and low sensitivities for detecting early tumour stages. Particularly for SCC-HN no sufficiently sensitive non-invasive tumour marker was available until now (Fischbach et al, 1990). Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-A) was considered a promising candidate in aiding diagnosis and monitoring of patients with SCC-HN, but the diagnostic performance finally turned out to be poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-A) was considered a promising candidate in aiding diagnosis and monitoring of patients with SCC-HN, but the diagnostic performance finally turned out to be poor. SCC-A was described to be elevated (> 2 ng ml -1 ) in 12-15% (Walther et al, 1990), 28% (Clasen et al, 1988), 33% (Dreyfuss et al, 1992), 38% (Fischbach et al, 1990;Koch et al, 1989) or 44% (Eibling et al, 1989) of SCC-HN patients. These results are in good agreement with our own unpublished experiences, where only 26% of a total of 322 SCC-HN patients were found to be positive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies reported very low sensitivity of various markers like CEA (carcinoembryonic antigen) (Silverman et al, 1976;Walther et al, 1990), Lipid associated sialic acid (Katopodis et al, 1982;Ropka et al, 1991) and SCC-marker (TA-4) (Calsen et al, 1990;Daver et al, 1990;Fichbach et al, 1990;Walther et al, 1990;Yoshimura et al, 1990;Ropka et al, 1991) in head and neck cancer patients. Cyfra 21-1 was reported as a new marker for non-small cell carcinoma of the lung (Pujol et al, 1993;Stieber et al, 1993;Rastel et al, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,19 Recently, cytokeratin 19 fragment (Cyfra) was reported to be a new marker in non-small cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung, as well as in uterine cervex carcinoma. [7][8][9] We grouped the patients with O-SCC according to primary tumor site, T classification, N classification, clinical stage, and pathologic parameters to examine the relationship between serum Cyfra levels and each of these factors. In our study, the threshold Cyfra level was set at 2.0 ng/ml because ROC analysis showed that this threshold allowed the best sensitivityspecificity relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Tumor markers are tumormediated molecules, but are not directly produced by tumor tissue. 7,10,11 Tumor markers used in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (O-SCC) include carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), 7,8 squamous cell carcinoma-antigen (SCCA), 7,9 immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP), 7 glutathione Stransferase-p (GST-p), 12 and dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP). 7,10,11 Tumor markers used in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (O-SCC) include carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), 7,8 squamous cell carcinoma-antigen (SCCA), 7,9 immunosuppressive acidic protein (IAP), 7 glutathione Stransferase-p (GST-p), 12 and dipeptidyl-peptidase (DPP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%