2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous movements of preterm infants is associated with outcome of gross motor development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 reported that antigravity limb movements in preterm infants within the first 3 months of corrected age were insufficient compared with those in term infants, and no improvement in development was observed in preterm infants within those first 3 months. They also showed that gross motor development at 6 and/or 12 months corrected age was delayed in infants who had insufficient antigravity limb movements in early infancy 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 reported that antigravity limb movements in preterm infants within the first 3 months of corrected age were insufficient compared with those in term infants, and no improvement in development was observed in preterm infants within those first 3 months. They also showed that gross motor development at 6 and/or 12 months corrected age was delayed in infants who had insufficient antigravity limb movements in early infancy 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, even with its limited results, the present study indicates that diaper design has a significant effect at least on the trajectory area of knee movement in the sagittal plane - a probable indicator of the range of lower leg lifting movements and proximity of these movements to the trunk. The extent to which such movement reflects the amount of kicking in the lower limbs needs further study, but it has also been reported that the development of antigravity movements are critical for infants as they promote exploration activities of the form of their body, and increase sensory-motor experiences such as hand-foot contact (double touch), which are important as a basis for later motor development 9,28,30 . As diaper design can influence such movements, it seems possible that careful design of infant clothing, including diapers, may contribute to more proper development of the body movements of young infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other tools developed to evaluate specific gross motor behaviors—for example, spontaneous general movements and postural development- and specific fine motor behaviors- for example, reaching kinematics or object exploration—should also be used in future studies to deeply investigate the relationships between gross and fine motor skills and later developmental outcomes. Indeed, as other studies on typically developing and ELGA infants have suggested ( Charitou et al, 2010 ; Pin et al, 2010 ), researchers in the future could examine the achievement of specific gross motor milestones, for example, unsupported sitting, fine motor milestones, proficient planning, control of reaching, or complex object exploratory patterns ( Fallang et al, 2005 ; Zuccarini et al, 2016 , 2017 ; Kaul et al, 2019 ), as well as, their relationships with spontaneous general movements, e.g., anti-gravity limbs movements, showed by preterm infants in the very first months of life ( Miyagishima et al, 2018 ). This could be helpful for more deeply understanding intradomain and cross-domain relationships and for identifying which specific early gross and fine motor skills predict later motor and cognitive development in ELGA infants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants’ spontaneous movements during infancy are related to their developmental outcomes later in life ( Bultmann et al, 2019 ; Butcher et al, 2009 ; Hadders-Algra et al, 1997 ; Karch et al, 2012 ; Miyagishima et al, 2018 ). Moreover, spontaneous movements show different forms at different ages and are influenced by brain structure and maturational level ( Kobesova & Kolar, 2014 ; Prechtl, 1997 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%