2015
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.5019-13.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous Activity Does Not Predict Morphological Type in Cerebellar Interneurons

Abstract: The effort to determine morphological and anatomically defined neuronal characteristics from extracellularly recorded physiological signatures has been attempted with varying success in different brain areas. Recent studies have attempted such classification of cerebellar interneurons (CINs) based on statistical measures of spontaneous activity. Previously, such efforts in different brain areas have used supervised clustering methods based on standard parameterizations of spontaneous interspike interval (ISI) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Climbing fiber afferents can be characterized by recording the iconic action potentials that they evoke in Purkinje cells [54]. Mossy fiber afferents and cerebellar interneurons cannot be conclusively identified using electrophysiological criteria [55]. However, they can be labeled using the technique of juxtacellular stimulation.…”
Section: Stimulating and Identifying Cerebellar Afferents And Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Climbing fiber afferents can be characterized by recording the iconic action potentials that they evoke in Purkinje cells [54]. Mossy fiber afferents and cerebellar interneurons cannot be conclusively identified using electrophysiological criteria [55]. However, they can be labeled using the technique of juxtacellular stimulation.…”
Section: Stimulating and Identifying Cerebellar Afferents And Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haar et al [ 17 ] have questioned the validity of our decision algorithm. They attempted to evaluate it in two ways: (1) by using a simulated data set based on a sample of statistics with which we developed our algorithm [ 12 ] and (2) by applying our algorithm to spontaneous firing statistics from juxtacellularly identified cells collected in the mouse vestibulocerebellum [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They attempted to evaluate it in two ways: (1) by using a simulated data set based on a sample of statistics with which we developed our algorithm [ 12 ] and (2) by applying our algorithm to spontaneous firing statistics from juxtacellularly identified cells collected in the mouse vestibulocerebellum [ 18 ]. With respect to the first attempt, Haar et al [ 17 ] created simulated data assuming a multivariate normal distribution of the five statistical parameters used in our decision algorithm [ 12 ]. However, the assumption of normality is not supported by our data (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We tested clustering for two through six clusters. Following Haar et al (2015a), we used the cluster validity index proposed by Zhang et al (2008). This index uses a ratio between a variation measure in each cluster and a separation measure be-tween the fuzzy clusters.…”
Section: Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%