2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Split-path nonlinear integral control for transient performance improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in many (industrial) applications a static input-output relation does not exist because plant performance is generally related to generic, time-varying steady-state plant behavior. This time-varying plant behavior emerges, for example, in reference tracking or disturbance attenuation problems, which are encountered, for example, in industrial motion systems, such as, pick-and-place systems (van Loon, Hunnekens, Heemels, van de Wouw, & Nijmeijer, 2016), electron microscopes, and wafer scanning systems (Heertjes & Nijmeijer, 2012;Heertjes, Schuurbiers, & Nijmeijer, 2009). Indeed, optimal steadystate plant performance and the corresponding optimal tuning are heavily dependent on the (time-varying) disturbance situation and reference trajectory at hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many (industrial) applications a static input-output relation does not exist because plant performance is generally related to generic, time-varying steady-state plant behavior. This time-varying plant behavior emerges, for example, in reference tracking or disturbance attenuation problems, which are encountered, for example, in industrial motion systems, such as, pick-and-place systems (van Loon, Hunnekens, Heemels, van de Wouw, & Nijmeijer, 2016), electron microscopes, and wafer scanning systems (Heertjes & Nijmeijer, 2012;Heertjes, Schuurbiers, & Nijmeijer, 2009). Indeed, optimal steadystate plant performance and the corresponding optimal tuning are heavily dependent on the (time-varying) disturbance situation and reference trajectory at hand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radial unboundedness must be checked only in the σ, v and φ components because b, q and τ are bounded in C ∪ D ⊂ Ξ. To this end, nonnegativity of the last two terms in (51) and positive definiteness of…”
Section: A Lipschitz Lyapunov Function For the Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific examples are the hybrid integrator-gain system [21], [48], improving tracking performance and limiting overshoot. Overshoot reduction of linear systems using hybrid control is also presented, e.g., in [12], [51]. Analysis and design tools for reset controllers are presented in [34], [50] and in the recent overviews [9], [38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Another recent example also inducing discontinuous output signals is given by the split-path nonlinear integrator. 15 Contrarily, an example that avoids the resets and generates a continuous output signal instead is given by the variable-gain integrator controller. 16 To exploit the hinted phase advantages of the Clegg integrator regarding closed-loop sensitivity peaking, but at the same time not compromise the time-domain performance properties that deteriorate by state resets, the hybrid integrator-gain system (HIGS) has recently been developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%