1997
DOI: 10.1006/jfin.1997.0212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinoffs and Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Krishnaswami and Subramaniam (1999) find that firms with higher levels of information asymmetry exhibit higher abnormal returns adjusted for the probability of a spin-off upon the announcements of spin-offs. Habib et al (1997) also present an information-based explanation for spin-offs. They derive a model in which a firm can increase its value by spinning off a subsidiary.…”
Section: Improvement Of Industrial Focusmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Krishnaswami and Subramaniam (1999) find that firms with higher levels of information asymmetry exhibit higher abnormal returns adjusted for the probability of a spin-off upon the announcements of spin-offs. Habib et al (1997) also present an information-based explanation for spin-offs. They derive a model in which a firm can increase its value by spinning off a subsidiary.…”
Section: Improvement Of Industrial Focusmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Habib et al (1997) paper leads to the hypothesis that firms, which show a decrease in information asymmetry after the spin-off, are associated with positive long-run excess returns.…”
Section: Information Asymmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, combining diverse operations creates information aggregation problems that can result in substantial information asymmetries within the firm (Habib et al, 1997), or between firm insiders and outside investors by suppressing the activities of information intermediaries (Gilson et al, 2001). While diversified firms in the U.S. must disclose segment data, this information can suffer from problems associated with segment identification, cost allocations, and transfer pricing schemes (e.g., Givoly et al, 1999).…”
Section: Measures Of Organizational Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miles and Rosenfeld (1983) and Allen, Lummer, McConnell, and Reed (1995) argue that such positive excess returns can be partially explained by the value destroyed at the time of an earlier acquisition. Other justifications that are usually advanced are a return to industry focus (John and Ofek (1995), Daley, Mehrotra, and Sivakumar (1997)), reduced information asymmetry (Habib, Johnsen, and Naik (1997), Krishnaswami and Subramaniam (1999), Martin and Sayrak (2003)) or tax and regulatory considerations (Schipper and Smith (1983) and Copeland and Mayers (1987)). Across these studies, the results tend to be stronger for larger deals (Klein (1986)) and deals that ultimately get consummated.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%