2018
DOI: 10.1097/dbp.0000000000000541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speed of Language Comprehension at 18 Months Old Predicts School-Relevant Outcomes at 54 Months Old in Children Born Preterm

Abstract: Individual differences in speed of spoken language comprehension may serve as a marker for neuropsychological processes that are critical for the development of school-relevant linguistic skills and nonverbal IQ in children born PT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also found that language skills at 24 months predicted verbal intelligence and full scale intelligence (partly also representing verbal capacities) at 6 years in both MLPT and FT children, after adjusting for maternal education. This is in line with a study on VPT children showing that language skills at 18 months predicted verbal intelligence at 4.5 years [16]. The finding that language, rather than cognitive skills, predicted later cognitive functioning might indicate that language skills are more stable or more suitable for prediction from an early age, while cognitive development may follow a more complex developmental trajectory between 2 and 6 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also found that language skills at 24 months predicted verbal intelligence and full scale intelligence (partly also representing verbal capacities) at 6 years in both MLPT and FT children, after adjusting for maternal education. This is in line with a study on VPT children showing that language skills at 18 months predicted verbal intelligence at 4.5 years [16]. The finding that language, rather than cognitive skills, predicted later cognitive functioning might indicate that language skills are more stable or more suitable for prediction from an early age, while cognitive development may follow a more complex developmental trajectory between 2 and 6 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Previous studies in preterm born and FT children found that attention [12,13], cognitive [14,15], language [16], and motor skills [17,18] measured at infant or toddler age were important predictors for later cognitive and behavioural outcomes, mainly in very preterm born (VPT; <32 weeks’ GA) children. Distinct predictors have not yet been identified for MLPT children in particular.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Word recognition skills demonstrated by toddlers at 25 months of age have been found to predict later language skills at eight years of age [ 30 ]. In addition, individual differences in processing speed in pre-term infants tested at 18 months of age were shown to predict receptive vocabulary at 3 years [ 31 ] and global language and cognitive abilities at 4.5 years [ 32 ]. Infants’ lexical processing abilities have been found to have high predictive validity for later literacy skills, school readiness, and academic performance in primary school, e.g., [ 33 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are similar to the findings of recent studies, [43–46] which examined children at the comparable age of 36 months. [43,44,46] Furthermore, the results of other studies [5,6,47,48,4953] and 2 meta-analyses [54,55] at different ages led to the same conclusion that children born preterm have a smaller expressive vocabulary than children born full-term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Most of the PT studies also used the Bayley-II or Bayley-III as an additional developmental test. [6,44,47,49,52,53,56] The findings indicated significant differences in cognitive development between PT and FT at a younger test age [6,44,49,52] but these findings were also noted in children at age 48 months. [57] Our results differ regarding the “receptive communication” subscale compared to the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%