2019
DOI: 10.25258/ijddt.9.2.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectrophotometric Determination Methyldopa and Salbutamol by Oxidative Coupling, Cloud Point and Flow Injection in Pharmaceutical Formulations

Abstract: TThree methods study in this research simple, sensitive, an expensive and rapid Oxidative Coupling reaction, Cloud Point Extraction and Flow Injection spectrophotometric methods for determination Methyldopa and Salbutamol, the first method oxidative coupling reaction between the Methyldopa and thiosemicarbazide in presence of ferric nitrate anhydrous to yield dark green colored product that have absorbance at λ max 460 nm. Salbutamol coupling reaction with 4-nitrophenyl hydrazine in presence the potassium Iodi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present spectrophotometric method has been compared with other spectrophotometric methods for determination of salbutamol and methyldopa. These methods are depended on the reduction of gold to gold nanoparticles in the presence of SDS surfactant for determination of salbutamol [29], 2,6-dichloroquinone-4-chlorimide (DCQ) in the medium of acetate buffer as coupling reagent for determination of methyldopa [30], and application of cloud point extraction in oxidative coupling reaction for determination of methyldopa and salbutamol using thiosemicarbazide and 4-nitrophenyl hydrazine respectively [15]. As seen in Table 4, the suggested method is more sensitive, accurate and precise than other methods.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Present Methods With Other Spectrophotometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present spectrophotometric method has been compared with other spectrophotometric methods for determination of salbutamol and methyldopa. These methods are depended on the reduction of gold to gold nanoparticles in the presence of SDS surfactant for determination of salbutamol [29], 2,6-dichloroquinone-4-chlorimide (DCQ) in the medium of acetate buffer as coupling reagent for determination of methyldopa [30], and application of cloud point extraction in oxidative coupling reaction for determination of methyldopa and salbutamol using thiosemicarbazide and 4-nitrophenyl hydrazine respectively [15]. As seen in Table 4, the suggested method is more sensitive, accurate and precise than other methods.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Present Methods With Other Spectrophotometric Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the determination of salbutamol sulphate and methyldopa, different analytical techniques have been proposed, like spectrophotometric [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], chromatographic [16][17][18][19], voltammetric [20][21], potentiometric [22], flow injection [23] and kinetic [24] methods. Our determination of salbutamol sulphate and methyldopa spectrophotometrically is actually new, simple, and sensitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many spectrophotometric procedures have been proposed for the estimation of MD in pharmaceutical preparations including difference UV-spectrophotometric assay in the presence of germanium dioxide at 292 nm [22], Flowinjection spectrophotometry [23][24][25][26], fluorimetry [27,28], kinetic spectrophotometry [29][30][31] and extractive spectrophotometry [32,33]. Moreover, the colorimetric method was the most widespread for estimation of MD in dosage form using I2 solution with acetate buffer of pH 4.7 [4], 2-aminothiazole in alkaline medium [25], thiosemicarbazide in presence of ferric nitrate [26], NH4VO3 in the presence H3PO4 [34], (NH4)6Mo7O24.4H2O solution in H2SO4 [35], Fe(III)-ophenanthroline [36], barbituric acid [37], isoniazid in presence of Nbromosuccinamide [38], diazotised sulphanilamide in the presence of molybdate [39], periodate in H2SO4 and determination of unreacted periodate by adding methylene blue and KI [40], iron (III) in the presence of 1,10phenanthroline and 2,2'-bipyridyl [41], p-nitroaniline in the presence of molybdate ions in acidic medium [42], Ce(IV) nitrate solution in H2SO4 [43], bromothymol blue in alkaline medium [44], sodium nitrite in an acid medium and further reacting the resultant nitroso derivative with sodium hydroxide [45], 2,2-diphenyil-picrylhydrazyl [46], 2,6dichloroquinone-4-chlorimide in acetate buffer and in water and ethanol solvents [47] and p-phenylenediamine in phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 [48]. 3-methylbenzothiazolin-2one hydrazone hydrochloride (MBTH) was used with (NH4)2SO4.Ce(SO4)2 in acetone or with K2Cr2O7 in methanol medium to determine MD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many of these methods suffer from one or more disadvantages such as critical optimum conditions, heating, and extraction using an organic solvent, narrow linear dynamic range, poor selectivity and low sensitivity [18]. Flow injection is the best technique characterized as easy, inexpensive, quick and selective drug estimation [19], and the flow injection analysis (FIA) method has many interests, such as increasing sample throughput, low reagent use, reducing waste generation, and inexpensive equipment [20,21]. New methods for estimating sulfadoxine in conventional medicines are used in this work, based on eco-friendly and cheap methods that deliver quick, automated, reliable , accurate results that are applicable for use and do not require high work experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%