2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05)
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2005.332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectral Segmentation with Multiscale Graph Decomposition

Abstract: We present a multiscale spectral image segmentation algorithm. In contrast to most multiscale image processing, this algorithm works on multiple scales of the image in parallel, without iteration, to capture both coarse and fine level details. The algorithm is computationally efficient, allowing to segment large images. We use the Normalized Cut graph partitioning framework of image segmentation. We construct a graph encoding pairwise pixel affinity, and partition the graph for image segmentation.We demonstrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
402
0
4

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 454 publications
(417 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
402
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The TurboPixels algorithm was implemented in Matlab with several C extensions. 4 For N-cuts, we use the 2004 N-cut implementation based on [27], 5 while for Sb, we simply divide the image into even rectangular blocks, providing a naive but efficient benchmark for accuracy (other algorithms are expected to do better). All experiments were performed on a quadcore Xeon 3.6 GHz computer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The TurboPixels algorithm was implemented in Matlab with several C extensions. 4 For N-cuts, we use the 2004 N-cut implementation based on [27], 5 while for Sb, we simply divide the image into even rectangular blocks, providing a naive but efficient benchmark for accuracy (other algorithms are expected to do better). All experiments were performed on a quadcore Xeon 3.6 GHz computer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of superpixels is no longer directly controlled nor is the algorithm designed to ensure the quasi uniformity of segment size and shape. Cour et al [4] also proposed a linear time algorithm by solving a constrained multiscale N-Cuts problem, but this complexity does not take the number of superpixels into account. In practice, this method remains computationally expensive and thus unsuitable for large images with many superpixels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 compares our automatically generated segmentations to those of other algorithms [8,7,6,2,3] using the standard BSDS boundary precision-recall benchmark [18]. Precision-recall curves for the other algorithms are those reported in [3].…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of region boundaries on the BSDS Benchmark. Left: The segmentation quality of our algorithm is close to that of the current best-performing algorithm, gP b-owt-ucm [3], and superior to others [8,7,6,2], as benchmarked by [3]. Algorithms are evaluated in terms of precision and recall with respect to human groundtruth boundaries.…”
Section: Experiments and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include Gaussian assumption-based dynamic clustering algorithm [29] (GADCA), iterative mode separation algorithm [29] (IMSA), higher-order statistics method based on local maxima detection and adaptive wavelet transform [30] (HOSLW), the conventional MRF-based algorithm, Otsu thresholding [31] [32], the level set evolution-based method without reinitialization (LSEWRI) [33], the region-based active contour model (RACM) [34], and the multi-scale normalized cuts-based segmentation (MNCut) [35]. Experiments and analyses are carried out on medical and natural images, where the medical images are two typical mammogram and MRI brain images, and the Cameraman image is used as the representative image of a natural scene.…”
Section: Boundary (Edge) Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%