2001
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-001-1139-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speciation of mercury, tin, and lead compounds by gas chromatography with microwave-induced plasma and atomic-emission detection (GC–MIP–AED)

Abstract: Because of their high toxicity and widespread distribution, the reliable selective quantification of alkyl and aryl species containing mercury, tin, or lead has been one of the goals of speciation analysis in recent years. Since becoming commercially available, GC-MIP-AED has been one of the most-used tools in this work. In this paper, the value and limitations of GC-MIP-AED for the speciation of Hg, Sn, and Pb compounds in environmental samples are reviewed and compared with the analytical characteristics of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Fig. 4a, with the increase of the injection time of 300 mM NH 4 Ac into the capillary, the peak area of methylmercury increases to 30 s before decreasing.…”
Section: Sample Stacking Nace Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Fig. 4a, with the increase of the injection time of 300 mM NH 4 Ac into the capillary, the peak area of methylmercury increases to 30 s before decreasing.…”
Section: Sample Stacking Nace Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Great efforts were made in developing analytical methods for organomercury, such as gas chromatography (GC) [1][2][3][4][5] and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [5][6][7][8]. During the recent decade, capillary electrophoresis (CE) has become available as a routine tool for the analysis of environmental and biological samples, especially the speciation of environmental toxic compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other analytical methods for mercury content determination are presented in many publications [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. They are based on the following detection methods:…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8] Um dos principais inconvenientes desta técnica é o pré-tratamento tedioso da amostra, que envolve várias etapas de extração do analito, geralmente usando extrações líquido-líquido (LPE) e, posteriormente, a derivação do analito com tetraetilborato de sódio. 9 A cromatografia líquida (LC) também é efetiva para o fracionamento de estanho orgânico e inorgânico, [10][11][12][13][14] porém, os limites de detecção são pobres quando detectores convencionais são utilizados. O limite de detecção pode ser consideravelmente melhorado quando a LC é acoplada ao ICP-MS. [13][14][15] No entanto, métodos envolvendo a LC requerem, pelo menos, uma etapa de pré-tratamento usando LPE antes da separação cromatográfica, mesmo para amostras de água.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified