1986
DOI: 10.1159/000261764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Speaking Rate and Segments: A Look at the Relation between Speech Production and Speech Perception for the Voicing Contrast

Abstract: When listeners process segmentally relevant properties of the speech signal they do so in a rate-dependent manner. This is seen as a shift in the perceptual category boundary; as rate declines and overall syllable duration increases, the category boundary moves toward a longer value of the acoustic property in question. Focusing on the /b/-/p/ distinction specified by voice onset time (VOT), we investigated whether the acoustic modifications that occur with an alteration in speaking rate accord with this patte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
166
4
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(16 reference statements)
15
166
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the effect both has a larger effect size and is more significant for voiceless than for voiced stops, reflecting the pattern seen in empirical plots of VOT as a function of speaking rate deviation (Figure 3). These differences between the voiceless and voiced stop speaking rate effects are in line with previous work on global speaking rate effects in lab speech (e.g., Miller et al 1986;Kessinger and Blumstein 1997). Phrase-medial stops have lower VOT than phrase-initial stops, as anticipated.…”
Section: Speaker-level and Observation-level Variablessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the effect both has a larger effect size and is more significant for voiceless than for voiced stops, reflecting the pattern seen in empirical plots of VOT as a function of speaking rate deviation (Figure 3). These differences between the voiceless and voiced stop speaking rate effects are in line with previous work on global speaking rate effects in lab speech (e.g., Miller et al 1986;Kessinger and Blumstein 1997). Phrase-medial stops have lower VOT than phrase-initial stops, as anticipated.…”
Section: Speaker-level and Observation-level Variablessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For voiceless stops bilabials had shorter VOT than both alveolars and velars, which were not significantly different from each other, as has been found for other speakers of British English (Docherty 1992). VOT has been observed to increase as overall global speech rate decreases for voiceless stops, but to show no significant effect of speaking rate for voiced stops (e.g., Miller et al 1986;Kessinger and Blumstein 1997). We found a similar pattern, with significantly shorter VOT for faster local speaking rate for voiceless stops and marginally shorter VOT for voiced stops.…”
Section: Phonetic and Linguistic Factors And Vot In Spontaneous Scottmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The basis for this type of research is the proposai that phonetic categories contain a central prototype that eharacterizes a phonetic feature, with less typical exemplars surrounding il. Such a frame'NOrk has been suggested for VOT categories which provide acoustic eues for the identification of initial stop consonants (Miller, Green, & Reeves, 1986). For instance, Andruski, Blumstein, and Burton (1994) conducted an auditory semantie priming experiment to examine 'Nhether subphonetic manipulations in VOT YIOuld affect lexical aeeess.…”
Section: Phantic Perception In Aphasiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to clear speech, nonuniform increases in segment durations have been found with changes in speaking rate ͑Miller et al, 1986͑Miller et al, , 1988. A number of studies that examined the effect of speaking rate on temporal features of speech, such as VOT, short/long vowel duration, and single/geminate stop duration, argue for relational invariance in the production of these contrasts across speaking rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%