This manuscript bas been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directIy trom the original or copy submittOO. Thus, sorne thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others May be from any type of computer printer.The quality of tbis reproduction is dependent upon tbe quality of the copY submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment cao adversely affect reproduction.In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be notOO. A1so, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletioD.Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, chans) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning al the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is alsa photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced farm al the back ofthe book.Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographica1ly in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographie prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to arder. UMI

No abstract

A phonetic identification experiment was conducted in order to assess the extent to which lexical information influenced low-level speech perception processes in three different age groups of subjects (20–29 years, 60–69 years, and 70–79 years). Subjects were required to label syllable-initial, bilabial stop consonants which varied in voice onset time (VOT) as either /b/ or /p/. Following Ganong [J.E.P.: H.P.P. 6, 110–125 (1980)], a pair of VOT continua with opposing lexical biases was created: one continuum ranged from the word /buk/ to the nonword /puk/ while the other continuum ranged from the nonword /bu t/ to the word /put/. VOT values for the syllable-initial /b/–/p/ phoneme were the same at corresponding steps in the two continua. Results indicated a significant influence of lexical status on phonetic identifications for all age groups. Furthermore, a significant difference in the location of the phonetic crossover boundary was observed, with older subjects showing longer VOT values than young subjects. While findings suggest that top-down processing is still a prevalent part of phonetic perception in elderly individuals, it appears that aging may bring changes in the values of the acoustic parameters used to define phonetic categories. [Work supported by McGill University.]