2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1257002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SOX, Corporate Transparency, and the Cost of Debt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
16
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, to our knowledge, this paper is the first to document that media coverage can exert a significant economic impact on debt offerings. Our finding is consistent with several recent studies, which suggest that an improvement in the firm's information environment decreases credit spreads (see Andrade, Bernile, and Hood (2014), Cassar, Ittner, and Cavalluzzo (2014)).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…First, to our knowledge, this paper is the first to document that media coverage can exert a significant economic impact on debt offerings. Our finding is consistent with several recent studies, which suggest that an improvement in the firm's information environment decreases credit spreads (see Andrade, Bernile, and Hood (2014), Cassar, Ittner, and Cavalluzzo (2014)).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Similarly, firms with stock trading in the U.S. OTC markets tend to issue more bonds (primarily before SOX), but the OTC coefficient is smaller in magnitude and statistical significance across all models. The rank ordering of the three ADR variables is 14 Consistent with this argument, Andrade et al (2014) find that SOX is associated with a significant decrease in the cost of debt mainly due to an increase in corporate transparency. consistent with exchange-listings conferring the largest monitoring, transparency, and visibility benefits to bond-issuing firms.…”
Section: Propensity Of Bond Financing Analysesmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Transparency risk covers more than accounting imprecision, however, and may relate to additional factors such as dealer operations, regulatory supervision, information collected to monitor possible systemic risk and price transparency for non‐dealers, such as whether the OTC dealer‐quoted prices are based on fresh trades or dealer consensus. Changes in these factors through self‐regulation could influence CDS spreads, as could changes in accounting regulations and disclosure quality, such as the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 (Andrade et al ., ). Also, there still remains intransparency for outside investors regarding the identity of counterparties.…”
Section: Cds Contracts and Institutional Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 97%