Abstract:The market for credit default swaps has developed into a well-functioning, global multi-trillion dollar market, wherein investors price and transfer corporate financial instruments on the basis of credit risk. This paper first summarizes the structure and growth of the market. Next, I introduce theory and evidence on how investors price credits risk and explain how the quality of financial statement information plays a unique role in the determination of credit spread. I then review the nascent empirical accou… Show more
“…This paper complements the extant research on RFDs that focuses exclusively on equity markets. Our study also responds directly to the call for further research on the effect of corporate disclosures in a CDS setting (Griffin 2014). More importantly, our results provide evidence on the impact of qualitative disclosures on CDS spreads relative to quantitative disclosures (e.g., performance metrics and management earnings forecasts) that have been documented in the prior research (e.g., Callen et al 2009;Shivakumar et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“… Griffin (, 848) indicates that “the credit derivative market provides a new setting to examine how accounting information might affect investors' risk assessments….”…”
This study examines the relation between narrative risk disclosures in mandatory reports and the pricing of credit risk. In particular, we investigate whether and how the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandate of risk factor disclosures (RFDs) affects credit default swap (CDS) spreads. Based on the theory of Duffie and Lando (2001), we predict and find that CDS spreads decrease significantly after RFDs are made available in 10‐K/10‐Q filings. These results suggest that RFDs improve information transparency about the firm's underlying risk, thereby reducing the information risk premium in CDS spreads. The content analysis further reveals that disclosures pertinent to financial and idiosyncratic risk are especially relevant to credit investors. In cross‐sectional analyses, we document that RFDs are more useful for evaluating the business prospects and default risk of firms with greater information uncertainty/asymmetry. Overall, our findings imply that the SEC requirement for adding a risk factor section to periodic reports enhances the transparency of firm risk and facilitates credit investors in evaluating the credit quality of the firm.
“…This paper complements the extant research on RFDs that focuses exclusively on equity markets. Our study also responds directly to the call for further research on the effect of corporate disclosures in a CDS setting (Griffin 2014). More importantly, our results provide evidence on the impact of qualitative disclosures on CDS spreads relative to quantitative disclosures (e.g., performance metrics and management earnings forecasts) that have been documented in the prior research (e.g., Callen et al 2009;Shivakumar et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“… Griffin (, 848) indicates that “the credit derivative market provides a new setting to examine how accounting information might affect investors' risk assessments….”…”
This study examines the relation between narrative risk disclosures in mandatory reports and the pricing of credit risk. In particular, we investigate whether and how the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandate of risk factor disclosures (RFDs) affects credit default swap (CDS) spreads. Based on the theory of Duffie and Lando (2001), we predict and find that CDS spreads decrease significantly after RFDs are made available in 10‐K/10‐Q filings. These results suggest that RFDs improve information transparency about the firm's underlying risk, thereby reducing the information risk premium in CDS spreads. The content analysis further reveals that disclosures pertinent to financial and idiosyncratic risk are especially relevant to credit investors. In cross‐sectional analyses, we document that RFDs are more useful for evaluating the business prospects and default risk of firms with greater information uncertainty/asymmetry. Overall, our findings imply that the SEC requirement for adding a risk factor section to periodic reports enhances the transparency of firm risk and facilitates credit investors in evaluating the credit quality of the firm.
“…() investigate the impact of profitability on the use of CDSs and find that net buyers of protection have a higher ROE , which means that they are more highly levered and hence more vulnerable to shocks. Das and Hanouna () show that firms with higher performance as measured by ROE and ROA have CDS securities with lower spreads (see also Griffin, ). Thus, the probability of default is lower when the firm's profitability improves.…”
Section: Econometric Model and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the inception of credit default swap (CDS) trading in the early 2000s, the CDS market has grown phenomenally (Griffin, ), although the onset of the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2007 led to a significant decline in the market. Many claim that CDSs provide incentives for risk‐taking in banks (e.g.…”
Since the innovation of credit default swaps (CDSs) in 1997, the market for CDSs grew dramatically to $62 trillion in 2007 (ISDA 2010). However, this market declined significantly with the onset of the GFC, prompting the question, 'What lies behind the phenomenal growth and the eventual collapse of the CDS market?' Using CDS spread data from 319 bank and non-bank financial institutions across 33 countries over the period 2001-2010, I provide evidence of the determinants that affect risk-taking by financial institutions, proxied by CDS spreads, and argue within an agency theoretical framework that managerial risk-taking contributed to the 'rise and fall' of the CDS market.
“…Of the handful of such studies, most are based either on credit ratings or on corporate bond yield spreads (see the discussion below). There are many reasons why the CDS market dominates the corporate bond market and credit ratings for analyzing credit risk (see Callen et al 2009 andGriffin 2014). For example, unlike CDS contracts, bond spreads include factors unrelated to credit risk, such as interest rate risk and other systematic risk factors (Elton et al 2001).…”
Section: Ifrs Transparency and Credit Riskmentioning
T his study tests whether international financial reporting standards (IFRS) adoption increased accounting transparency based on model-driven hypotheses. Duffie and Lando [Duffie D, Lando D (2001) Term structures of credit spreads with incomplete accounting information. Econometrica 69 (3): [633][634][635][636][637][638][639][640][641][642][643][644] show that changes to accounting transparency affect the spread/maturity relation of credit default swap (CDS) instruments in very specific ways. Consistent with their model, we find that CDS spreads are lower across maturities following the adoption of IFRS, and the slope and concavity of the CDS spread/maturity relation are higher. These changes did not occur to the spread/maturity relation of a control sample of CDS instruments. Predicted changes apply more intensely to firms with low pre-IFRS transparency. Overall, this study provides strong evidence that IFRS adoption increased accounting transparency.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.