Abstract:This paper investigates the relation between media coverage and offering yield spreads using a comprehensive dataset of 5,338 industrial bonds issued from 1990 to 2011. We find that media coverage is negatively associated with firms’ cost of debt. This association is robust to controlling for standard yield determinants, different model specifications, and endogeneity. We identify 4 economic channels through which media coverage influences the cost of debt: Information asymmetry, governance, liquidity, and def… Show more
“…List is a dummy that equals 1 if a firm is on the Best CSR List in a given year and 0 otherwise. In our regressions, we use eight explanatory variables to control for the impacts of firm‐level factors (Du et al ., 2017; Gao et al ., 2020; Ye and Zhang, 2011). Firm size ( Log_Size ) and firm age ( Log_Age ) control for a firm's financing flexibility and information asymmetry.…”
Section: Data Key Variables and Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer this question, several research design challenges need to be resolved. To mitigate the concerns that confounding factors might affect our analysis, guided by Gao et al (2020), for any given year and the same CECE grades, we use a propensity score matching (PSM) approach to identify a de facto counterfactual control group and compare scaled advertising and sales expenses for firms on the list with matched firms not on the Best CSR List. The PSM requires matched firms to have similar fundamental characteristics across eight dimensions: Size, Age, ROA, Lev, SG, AT, Own, and SOE.…”
We show that those Chinese listed companies that are riding high on the media corporate social responsibility (CSR) ranking lists tend to have greater advertising (sales) expenses and poor environmental performance. This observation suggests that some companies opportunistically use media to greenwash their image, hoping to capture economic rents. Indeed, our evidence shows that greenwashing firms benefit in the lending market by exploiting the media to gain a kind of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) endorsement, thereby allowing them to achieve a lower cost of debt and to experience lower collateral obligations. The evidence suggests an adverse incentive to exploit ESG awareness via media coverage in weak institutional environments and opaque ESG disclosure regimes.
“…List is a dummy that equals 1 if a firm is on the Best CSR List in a given year and 0 otherwise. In our regressions, we use eight explanatory variables to control for the impacts of firm‐level factors (Du et al ., 2017; Gao et al ., 2020; Ye and Zhang, 2011). Firm size ( Log_Size ) and firm age ( Log_Age ) control for a firm's financing flexibility and information asymmetry.…”
Section: Data Key Variables and Descriptive Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer this question, several research design challenges need to be resolved. To mitigate the concerns that confounding factors might affect our analysis, guided by Gao et al (2020), for any given year and the same CECE grades, we use a propensity score matching (PSM) approach to identify a de facto counterfactual control group and compare scaled advertising and sales expenses for firms on the list with matched firms not on the Best CSR List. The PSM requires matched firms to have similar fundamental characteristics across eight dimensions: Size, Age, ROA, Lev, SG, AT, Own, and SOE.…”
We show that those Chinese listed companies that are riding high on the media corporate social responsibility (CSR) ranking lists tend to have greater advertising (sales) expenses and poor environmental performance. This observation suggests that some companies opportunistically use media to greenwash their image, hoping to capture economic rents. Indeed, our evidence shows that greenwashing firms benefit in the lending market by exploiting the media to gain a kind of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) endorsement, thereby allowing them to achieve a lower cost of debt and to experience lower collateral obligations. The evidence suggests an adverse incentive to exploit ESG awareness via media coverage in weak institutional environments and opaque ESG disclosure regimes.
“…By producing and disseminating information to a broad audience, the media play an essential role in reducing information asymmetry among stakeholders (Fang and Peress, 2009). Extant research documents that the media can detect accounting fraud (Joe et al , 2009; Miller, 2006), affect a manager’s capital allocation decision (Liu and McConnell, 2013), increase the probability of forced top-executive turnover (You et al , 2017) and reduce the cost of debt (Gao et al , 2020) and stock price crash risk (An et al , 2020). In addition, media coverage helps in reducing uncertainty, increasing transparency, enhancing credibility and highlighting the feasibility of future projects (Huang et al , 2018).…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
Purpose
Prior research documents that chief executive officer (CEO) characteristics and succession planning affect audit fees. However, whether new CEOs’ media coverage influences audit fees remains unexplored. This study aims to fill this gap by examining whether auditors price media coverage of the new CEO.
Design/methodology/approach
The sample comprises 89 US listed firms with CEO turnover over the period 2012–2016, resulting in a total of 445 firm-year observations. Panel data models are used in the analyses.
Findings
The results show that audit fees are higher for firms that hire a new CEO covered with more negative media tone. This study further documents that CEO media tone is determined independently of audit pricing, but that the extent of audit fees is positively related to a new CEO covered with more negative media tone, consistent with a sequential media-tone-then-audit-pricing process.
Research limitations/implications
The results of this study should motivate future auditing research to consider the media as an important source of external information. The findings are also relevant to stakeholders who are interested in understanding the relationship between auditors and their clients’ CEOs.
Originality/value
This study contributes to the audit fee literature by providing new evidence that auditors view their clients’ CEO with a negative media tone as requiring greater audit effort and leading to higher risks, due to greater public and regulators’ attention conveyed in news coverage. Moreover, the finding of this study that audit fees are higher for firms that hire a new CEO covered with more negative media tone is novel, and extends Joe’s (2003) empirical finding that negative press coverage increases auditors’ perception of risk.
“…Investors in firms included in the Standard & Poor's (S&P) 1500 index are expected to rely less on information released by CRAs as S&P1500 are relatively large firms with high press coverage (Fang and Peress, 2009;Hillert et al, 2014) that plays the information disseminating role (Gao et al, 2020;Sun et al, 2020). Financial analysts are important information providers for investors (Chen and Lin, 2017; and, therefore, the informational utility of credit ratings for firms with higher analyst coverage is expected to be smaller than other firms.…”
Section: Alternative Information Channelmentioning
Using the passage of Dodd-Frank and the US sovereign downgrade as quasinatural experiments, we examine the effect of credit rating conservatism on corporate tax avoidance. We find that treatment firms engage in more taxplanning activities than control firms in both research settings. We further find that these effects are driven mainly by firms with large existing tax-planning capacity, firms with decreased use of external financing, firm with more reliance on rating information, and firms with weak external monitoring using the large Dodd-Frank sample. Overall, the findings provide evidence that credit rating conservatism plays a role in corporate tax-avoidance decisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.