1955
DOI: 10.2307/2607258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soviet Policy in Central Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Essentially, the Bolsheviks had eliminated anyone likely to oppose the new regime and prepared the way for a complete Soviet takeover. 76 Committees of the Communist Parties of Bukhara, Khorezm, and Turkestan passed resolutions that supported national delimitation. On 13 April 1924, the Central Asian Bureau {Sredazburo) of the Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party approved these resolutions.…”
Section: The Bolsheviks In Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Essentially, the Bolsheviks had eliminated anyone likely to oppose the new regime and prepared the way for a complete Soviet takeover. 76 Committees of the Communist Parties of Bukhara, Khorezm, and Turkestan passed resolutions that supported national delimitation. On 13 April 1924, the Central Asian Bureau {Sredazburo) of the Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party approved these resolutions.…”
Section: The Bolsheviks In Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unwittingly, these articles, which dealt with the creation of the national-territorial divisions, political education, the creation of native cadres, and the brief developmental period of national languages and literatures, aroused national consciousness and increased the demands for greater separate national autonomy. 78 Such demands came not only from the larger national groups, but also from smaller ones such as the Karakalpaks. Most viewed delimitation as an opportunity to enhance their territorial position at the expense of their neighbour.…”
Section: The Bolsheviks In Difficultymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Кириллица алфавиті, әрине, латын Вестник Карагандинского университета сияқты түркі тілдерін жазуға жарамды, ал екеуі де араб тіліне қарағанда анағұрлым қолайлы. Уилердің ойынша теріс аспект түркі мәдениетінің маңызды іргелі ерекшеліктерінің біріне нұқсан келтіруге және сол арқылы түркі халықтарын бір-бірімен байланыстыратын байланысты әлсіретуге тырысудан тұрады деп есептейді[7, 318]. Кезінде кеңес өкіметі Кеңес Одағының әртүрлі бөліктеріндегі сауаттылық мөлшерін 100 пайыз деп жариялады.…”
unclassified