1995
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(95)07188-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some reflections on the past and future of erosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
162
0
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 371 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
13
162
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This cutting model predicts quite well the angle of maximum erosion rate (ER) which is at the transition between cutting without particle immobilization and ploughing with immobilization at higher angles of incidence. In fact, it has been verified that experimental results are accurately predicted at low to moderate angles, but not at higher angles (θ > 40 o ) where the model significantly under-evaluates the material loss [53]. In more recent work, Finnie et al [54] found that the observed behavior at large angles of incidence could be explained by the dispersion of angles of incidence due to the increased surface roughness resulting from multiple particle impacts.…”
Section: Ductile Spe Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This cutting model predicts quite well the angle of maximum erosion rate (ER) which is at the transition between cutting without particle immobilization and ploughing with immobilization at higher angles of incidence. In fact, it has been verified that experimental results are accurately predicted at low to moderate angles, but not at higher angles (θ > 40 o ) where the model significantly under-evaluates the material loss [53]. In more recent work, Finnie et al [54] found that the observed behavior at large angles of incidence could be explained by the dispersion of angles of incidence due to the increased surface roughness resulting from multiple particle impacts.…”
Section: Ductile Spe Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, we do not believe this to be main reason for these low exponents. In fact, the models of erosion by ductile cutting of the surface predict a low exponent of 2 when no contribution from particle rotation is present [53]. In the case of normal particle impact, such as in the SPE tests conducted in this study, particle rotation is not expected to contribute significantly to surface cutting.…”
Section: Spe Behaviormentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Degradation of materials due to slurry erosion depends on many factors, which can be divided onto three main groups: the first one connected with fluid flow conditions (flow velocity, angle of particle impingement, particles concentration, liquid density, liquid chemical activity, liquid temperature), the second one connected with solid particles (size, shape, hardness, strength) and the third one connected with target material (mechanical and endurance properties: toughness, fatigue, yield and ultimate strengths, work hardening, surface topography, microstructure, number and size of defects) [3,6,[9][10][11][12]. Thus, the numbers of factors influencing slurry erosion is very big and the degradation of materials is a synergic effect of all mentioned factors.…”
Section: Slurry Erosion Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1946, when the first technical papers on erosive wear were published [9], many investigation of material degradation due to slurry have been performed. In 1960 Finnie [10] published his pioneer work about slurry erosion, in which degradation mechanisms and theoretical analyses for predicting erosion damage were presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%