Some physical properties of fababeans

Fraser, Bruce; Verma, Suraj; Muir, W. E.

doi:10.1016/0021-8634(78)90079-3

Cited by 90 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To this end, many researchers have focused on determining the physical and mechanical properties of plant material for many years (Fraser et al, 1978;Kabas and Vladut, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selected engineering properties of tiger nut as a function of moisture content and variety

Ince¹,

Vursavuş²,

Vurarak³

et al. 2017

Turk J Agric For

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Some physical and mechanical properties of two tiger nut varieties (Sarışeker and Balyumru) were determined at four moisture contents. Physical properties including length, width, thickness, geometric mean diameter, mass, 1000-tuber mass, bulk density, tuber density, surface area, terminal velocity, angle of repose, porosity, and friction coefficient were affected by moisture content at a 1% probability level, excluding sphericity. All parameters decreased with a decrease in moisture content except tuber density, porosity, and firmness. Variety only had a statistically significant effect on width, geometric mean diameter surface area, and terminal velocity at different probability levels. Force, deformation, firmness, energy absorbed, and power requirement, which were investigated as mechanical properties, were also affected by moisture content at a 1% probability level. It was also found that the variety and loading position had no significant effect on firmness and energy absorbed, respectively. Varieties showed differences in terms of 1000-tuber mass, sphericity, terminal velocity and angle of repose, length, geometric mean diameter, surface area, porosity, force, and energy absorbed at different probability levels.

show abstract

“…To this end, many researchers have focused on determining the physical and mechanical properties of plant material for many years (Fraser et al, 1978;Kabas and Vladut, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selected engineering properties of tiger nut as a function of moisture content and variety

Ince¹,

Vursavuş²,

Vurarak³

et al. 2017

Turk J Agric For

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mass (g) of individual onion was determined by using an electronic balance with an accuracy of 0.01 g. Actual volume was measured by the water displacement method (Mohsenin 1986;Kabas et al 2005;Karababa 2006). The bulk density was determined using the mass-volume relationship by filling an empty plastic container of predetermined volume and weight, the onion were placed inside the container from a constant height, and weight (Fraser et al 1978).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling the mass of Iranian export onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties using some physical characteristics

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ghabel R., Rajabipour A., Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M., Oveisi M., 2010. Modeling the mass of Iranian export onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties using some physical characteristics. Res. Agr. Eng., 56: 33-40.Mass modeling can be used for development of post-harvest equipment related to onion (Allium cepa L.) processing such as grading, packing and food production processes. There are instances in which it is desirable to determine relationships among crop physical characteristics. In this study, the mass of Iranian export onion varieties (Azarshahr and Sefide Qom) was predicted by using different physical characteristics applying linear models with three different classifications: (1) -single or multiple variable regressions of onion dimensional characteristics, (2) -single or multiple variable regressions of onion projected areas, (3) -estimating onion mass based on measured (actual) volume and volumes of assumed shapes (prolate spheroid and ellipsoid). The results showed that mass modeling of onion based on length and three projected areas are the most appropriate models in the first and second classification, respectively. In third classification, the highest determination coefficient was obtained for mass modeling based on the actual volume as R 2 = 0.99 whereas corresponding values were 0.96 for both assumed onion shapes (prolate spheroid and ellipsoid), respectively. In economical and agronomical point of view, suitable grading system of onion mass was obtained based on length as nonlinear relation M = 0.035a 2 -1.64a + 36.137, R 2 = 0.96.

show abstract

“…The physical properties of common bean have been studied by various researchers such as: Fraser et al (1978), haciseferogullari et al (2003), and altuntas & Yildiz (2007 for faba bean (Viciafaba l.); Olajide & ade-Omowaye (1999) and Ogunjimi et al (2002) for locust bean (Ceratonia siliqua l.); Oje & ugbor (1991) However, the physical properties of 'Hinis' and 'Ispir' have not been adequately or comparatively studied. The objective of this study was to determine some geometrical, gravimetric, frictional, aerodynamic, and other, mechanical properties and the colour of 'Hinis' and 'Ispir' bean seeds.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physico‐mechanical seed properties of the common Turkish bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars ‘Hinis’ and ‘Ispir’

Öztürk¹,

Kara

Yildiz

et al. 2009

New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

41Physico-mechanical seed properties of the common Turkish bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) for 'Hinis' and 'Ispir', respectively. The average 1000 seed weight, bulk density, and porosity were determined as: 531.3 and 598.9 g, 835.8 and 872.7 kg m -3 , and 34.0% and 33.1% for 'Hinis' and 'Ispir', respectively. The average angle of repose and terminal velocity were 24.52° and 19.46°, and 11.42 and 11.80 m s -1 in 'Hinis' and 'Ispir' respectively. The highest coefficient of dynamic friction was obtained with an aluminium surface in both cultivars as 0.227 for 'Hinis' and 0.199 for 'Ispir'. This was followed by fibreglass, steel, plywood, and glass surfaces. Both cultivars had white testae. The average value of rupture force, deformation at rupture point, energy absorbed, hardness, and toughness along the

show abstract

Some physical properties of fababeans

Cited by 90 publications

References 5 publications

Selected engineering properties of tiger nut as a function of moisture content and variety

Selected engineering properties of tiger nut as a function of moisture content and variety

Modeling the mass of Iranian export onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties using some physical characteristics

Physico‐mechanical seed properties of the common Turkish bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars ‘Hinis’ and ‘Ispir’

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About