1972
DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461.0304.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Linguistic Features of Negro Dialect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these features that have been suggested by linguistic studies include (5) higher rates of non-rhoticity, or r-less-ness, among African Americans than European American cohorts (Labov et al, 1968;Williamson, 1968;Wolfram, 1969;Foley, 1972;Baugh, 1983;Pederson et al, 1986Pederson et al, -1992Myhill, 1988;Edwards, 1997;Wolfram and Thomas, 2002); (6) substitution of /skr/ for /str/ (Fasold and Wolfram, 1970;Labov, 1972a;Wolfram and Fasold, 1974;Bailey and Thomas, 1998;Bailey, 2001;Wolfram and Thomas, 2002); (7) higher rates of ''broad a'' (e.g., as in aunt with the vowel of LOT instead of with the vowel of TRAP); (8) monophthongization, or weakening of glides of the mouth vowel (Wolfram and Thomas, 2002;Thomas, 2007); (9) a shift of word stress to the first syllable in words that are stressed on other syllables in other vernacular forms (e.g., as in December, July, police, hotel) (Fasold and Wolfram, 1970;Baugh, 1983); (10) the use of a wide pitch range, realized as expansions into higher pitches, especially in competitive style speech events (Tarone, 1973;Loman, 1975;Holbrook, 1981, 1982;Jun and Foreman, 1996); (11) a greater likelihood of displaying a high tone at the beginning of a sentence, either as a boundary tone or as a high initial pitch accent, i.e., pitch prominence; (12) a greater likelihood of displaying a variety of final contours in yes/no questions, such as falling or level final contours (Green, 2002), whereas European Americans consistently show a rising final contour (Jun and Foreman, 1996); (13) a statistically significant tendency to raise fundamental frequency (F0) from one stressed syllable to the next more often than European Americans (Wolfram and Thomas, 2002); (14) the deletion of final /n/, with only nasality on the preceding vowel remaining (Bailey, 2001); (15) the deletion of morpheme final voiced stops …”
Section: Social Stratification and The Basis For Out-group Derogationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these features that have been suggested by linguistic studies include (5) higher rates of non-rhoticity, or r-less-ness, among African Americans than European American cohorts (Labov et al, 1968;Williamson, 1968;Wolfram, 1969;Foley, 1972;Baugh, 1983;Pederson et al, 1986Pederson et al, -1992Myhill, 1988;Edwards, 1997;Wolfram and Thomas, 2002); (6) substitution of /skr/ for /str/ (Fasold and Wolfram, 1970;Labov, 1972a;Wolfram and Fasold, 1974;Bailey and Thomas, 1998;Bailey, 2001;Wolfram and Thomas, 2002); (7) higher rates of ''broad a'' (e.g., as in aunt with the vowel of LOT instead of with the vowel of TRAP); (8) monophthongization, or weakening of glides of the mouth vowel (Wolfram and Thomas, 2002;Thomas, 2007); (9) a shift of word stress to the first syllable in words that are stressed on other syllables in other vernacular forms (e.g., as in December, July, police, hotel) (Fasold and Wolfram, 1970;Baugh, 1983); (10) the use of a wide pitch range, realized as expansions into higher pitches, especially in competitive style speech events (Tarone, 1973;Loman, 1975;Holbrook, 1981, 1982;Jun and Foreman, 1996); (11) a greater likelihood of displaying a high tone at the beginning of a sentence, either as a boundary tone or as a high initial pitch accent, i.e., pitch prominence; (12) a greater likelihood of displaying a variety of final contours in yes/no questions, such as falling or level final contours (Green, 2002), whereas European Americans consistently show a rising final contour (Jun and Foreman, 1996); (13) a statistically significant tendency to raise fundamental frequency (F0) from one stressed syllable to the next more often than European Americans (Wolfram and Thomas, 2002); (14) the deletion of final /n/, with only nasality on the preceding vowel remaining (Bailey, 2001); (15) the deletion of morpheme final voiced stops …”
Section: Social Stratification and The Basis For Out-group Derogationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, although speakers of many dialects will tend to simplify consonant clusters and delete a stop when the following word begins with a consonant (e.g., as in pas' the house), (22) deletion of a stop when the following word begins with a vowel (e.g., as in pas' a house) occurs more frequently in AAVE than any other European American dialect at any social level (Labov et al, 1968;Wolfram, 1969;Fasold and Wolfram, 1970;Labov, 1972a;Baugh, 1983;Miller, 1986;Butters and Nix, 1986;Pederson et al, 1986Pederson et al, -1992Gordon, 2000;Wolfram and Thomas, 2002).…”
Section: Social Stratification and The Basis For Out-group Derogationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fasold 1972;Labov 1972;Baugh 1983;Mufwene et al 1998;Rickford 1998;Rickford and Rickford 2000). The literature has argued that AAVE, contrary to what the name suggests, is not exclusively associated with a particular ethnic group, namely, African Americans.…”
Section: Earlier Research On Aae Crossing and Hip Hopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early descriptive work by Labov et al (1968) and Fasold and Wolfram (1970) noted that despite regional differences these patterns tend to share enough of a resemblance in terms of both linguistic structure and social use to be included under the rubric of African American English in the sociolinguistic literature. 1 More recent work by Rickford (1999) provides a list of phonological, morphological, and syntactic features that are common to AAVE, and an even more detailed account of the attributes typical of AAVE speakers is provided by Green (2002).…”
Section: Issues In Characterizing Aavementioning
confidence: 99%