Some Features of Pragmatist Thought Still Remain Insufficiently Explored in Ethnomethodology

Quéré, Louis; Terzi, Cédric

doi:10.1007/s11133-010-9182-9

Cited by 12 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Essa contribuição da tradição pragmatista para o estudo da atividade coletiva torna, de fato, mais atenta à agentividade dos objetos em ação e àquela dos terceiros. Nas pesquisas de campo apresentadas acima, o lugar dos fenômenos de ritmos sugere que ele oferece também ferramentas para uma melhor consideração da temporalidade associada à noção de experiência (Bidet, 2011b, Quéré;Terzi, 2011: Rosa, 2010. Nosso último caso vai ilustrar.…”

Section: Da Consideração Dos Terceiros Para a Coincidência Momentâneaunclassified

Além Da Inteligibilidade Mútua

Bidet

Boutet²,

Chave

2019

Trab. Educ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As interações estão no centro das principais abordagens sociológicas do trabalho. Algumas linhas de pesquisa foram responsáveis por interações cooperativas que incluem perspectivas incomensuráveis. Mas neste artigo argumentamos que a noção de interação precisa ser estendida à noção de transação, profundamente enraizada na tradição pragmática americana. A mudança de interação para transação permite o estudo de uma ampla gama de situações sem inteligibilidade mútua. A principal característica é a coexistência de cooperação e perspectivas inteiramente assimétricas, não apenas por um momento transitório no processo de troca de perspectivas, mas como uma configuração estabilizada. Tais contextos significam chegar a um acordo com componentes de ambientes de trabalho longos, despercebidos, mas cada vez mais atuais. Para entender essas formas singulares de coordenação com interações mínimas, precisamos levar em conta o papel dos artefatos digitais, dos participantes de terceiros e dos ritmos pessoais. Este trabalho baseia-se em três estudos realizados em diferentes configurações organizacionais: um centro de controle de tráfego de telefone, um pronto-socorro pediátrico e jogos on-line no local de trabalho. Onde a atividade coletiva não significa inteligibilidade mútua, a análise se volta para as várias formas de vida desenvolvidas no processo de trabalho, os encontros intermitentes entre compromissos inconscientes uns dos outros e os trabalhadores confrontados com seus múltiplos espaços de atividade. ABSTRACT Interactions are at the center of the main sociological approaches to work. Some lines of research have been responsible for cooperative interactions that include immeasurable perspectives. But in this paper we argue that the notion of interaction needs to be extended to the notion of transaction, deeply rooted in the American pragmatic tradition. Switching from interaction to transaction allows the study of a wide range of situations without mutual intelligibility. The main feature is the coexistence of cooperation and entirely asymmetrical perspectives, not just for a transitional moment in the process of exchanging perspectives, but as a stabilized configuration. Such contexts mean coming to terms with components of long, unnoticed but increasingly current work environments. To understand these unique forms of coordination with minimal interaction, we need to consider the role of digital artifacts, third party participants, and personal rhythms. This work is based on three studies conducted in different organizational settings: a telephone traffic control center, a pediatric emergency room, and online workplace games. Where collective activity does not mean mutual intelligibility, analysis turns to the various forms of life developed in the work process, the intermittent encounters between each other's unconscious commitments and the workers confronted with their multiple spaces of activity

show abstract

Section: Da Consideração Dos Terceiros Para a Coincidência Momentâneaunclassified

Além Da Inteligibilidade Mútua

Bidet

Boutet²,

Chave

2019

Trab. Educ.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…pour une meilleure prise en compte de la temporalité, associée à la notion d'expérience (Bidet, 2011b ;Quéré, Terzi, 2011 ;Rosa, 2010). Notre dernier cas va l'illustrer.…”

Section: -De La Prise En Compte Des Tiers à La Coïncidence Momentanunclassified

Au-delà de l’intelligibilité mutuelle : l’activité collective comme transaction. Un apport du pragmatisme illustré par trois cas

Bidet¹,

Boutet²,

Chave³

2013

activites

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Beyond mutual intelligibility: collective activity as a transaction. The contribution of Pragmatism illustrated by three cases. Interactions are at the core of major sociological approaches to work. Some lines of research have accounted for cooperative interactions which include incommensurate perspectives. But in this paper we argue that the notion of interaction needs to be extended to the notion of transaction, deeply rooted in the American pragmatist tradition. The shift from interaction to transaction allows for the study of a wide range of situations lacking mutual intelligibility. The main feature is the coexistence of cooperation and entirely asymmetric perspectives, not just for a transitory moment in the process of exchanging perspectives, but as a stabilized configuration. Such contexts mean coming to terms with long unnoticed but increasingly topical components of work environments. To understand these singular forms of coordination with minimal interactions, we need to take account of the role of digital artifacts, third-party participants, and personal rhythms. This paper draws on three studies conducted in different organizational settings: a telephone traffic control center, a pediatric emergency room, and on-line gaming in the workplace. Where collective activity does not mean mutual intelligibility, the analysis turns to the various forms of life developed in the process of work, the intermittent encounters between commitments that are unaware of one another, and the workers confronted with their multiple spaces of activity KEYWORDS

show abstract

“…Harold Garfinkel et Harvey Sacks, « On formal structures of practical actions », dans J. C. McKinney et E. A.l'action à Bar-Hillel 53 , qui lui-même se référait aux classes de signes de Peirce54 . Dans la sociologie française sensible à ces courants, les rapports entre ethnométhodologie et pragmatisme ont pourtant plutôt été envisagés jusqu'ici du côté des travaux de John Dewey55 . Hallée et al), la réception de Peirce en sociologie s'est aussi jouée, pour une partie importante, dans le cadre de débats sur l'épistémologie et les méthodes des sciences sociales61 .…”

unclassified