2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.ajss.s.2016040101.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somatotyping and Biomotor Features of Male Children of Chandauli and Mirzapur Districts of Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract: Abstract:Five hundred and one (501) male children aged between eight and fourteen years were selected randomly from the districts of Chandauli and Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, India for establishing the association between components of somatotyping and biomotor features. Heath-Carter technique was used to determine the somatotyping of the children. Hand grip strength, sit and reach test, vertical jump and 4x10m agility test were used for biomotor features. Product moment correlation was used to determine the rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature, there are studies indicating that there is no relationship between hamstring flexibility and somatotype component [24]. Singh et al [25] found a negative relationship between endomorph and flexibility in 8-year-old children, and in the same study found a significant positive relationship between endomorph and flexibility in 9-year-old children. This suggests that somatotype elements may cause inconsistent findings in terms of flexibility performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the literature, there are studies indicating that there is no relationship between hamstring flexibility and somatotype component [24]. Singh et al [25] found a negative relationship between endomorph and flexibility in 8-year-old children, and in the same study found a significant positive relationship between endomorph and flexibility in 9-year-old children. This suggests that somatotype elements may cause inconsistent findings in terms of flexibility performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%