Plant Breeding Reviews 1998
DOI: 10.1002/9780470650110.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somaclonal Variation: Molecular Analysis, Transformation Interaction, and Utilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 153 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kiselev). Johnson, 1989;Dahleen et al, 1991;Duncan et al, 1997;Bregitzer et al, 1998;Veilleux and Johnson, 1998). The mechanisms producing both somatically and meiotically heritable variations can contribute to the decline in the vigor and regenerability of cultures over time (Kaeppler et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kiselev). Johnson, 1989;Dahleen et al, 1991;Duncan et al, 1997;Bregitzer et al, 1998;Veilleux and Johnson, 1998). The mechanisms producing both somatically and meiotically heritable variations can contribute to the decline in the vigor and regenerability of cultures over time (Kaeppler et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Point mutations, chromosomal rearrangements, recombination, DNA methylation, altered sequence copy number, and transposable elements are believed to be the basis of somaclonal variation (Kang et al, 2007). Several factors, such as genotype age of donor plants, type of explants, and age of culture, are reported to contribute toward this effect (Veilleaux and Johnson, 1998;Jain, 2001). Somaclonal variation mimics induced mutations and can be induced in both asexually propagated plants.…”
Section: Tissue Culture In Cassava Breedingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discrepancies relate to the complexity of the plant genome, and the markers that are normally used often cannot give a complete view [88]. To resolve this difficulty, assay at the molecular level should be examined in relation to morphological changes.…”
Section: Molecular Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%