Recent Advances in Plant in Vitro Culture 2012
DOI: 10.5772/50367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Somaclonal Variation in Tissue Culture: A Case Study with Olive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
62
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were reported using the RAPD technique in Norway spruce (Fourré et al 1997), Japanese black pine (Goto et al 1998), Japanese white oak (Thakur et al 1999), loblolly pine (Tang 2001), almond (Martins et al 2004), hazelnut (Nas et al 2004, pedunculate oak (Valladares et al 2006), cork oak (Fernandes et al 2011), apricot (Soliman 2012), annatto (Siril and Joseph 2013), and seedless lemon (Goswami et al 2013). In contrast, RAPD analysis reported genetic variation in poplar (Ostry et al 1994;Rani et al 1995), white spruce (Isabel et al 1995(Isabel et al , 1996, peach (Hashmi et al 1997), teak (Gangopadhyay et al 2003), Idaho locust (Ngezahayo et al 2006), stone pine (Cuesta et al 2010), and olive (Leva et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar results were reported using the RAPD technique in Norway spruce (Fourré et al 1997), Japanese black pine (Goto et al 1998), Japanese white oak (Thakur et al 1999), loblolly pine (Tang 2001), almond (Martins et al 2004), hazelnut (Nas et al 2004, pedunculate oak (Valladares et al 2006), cork oak (Fernandes et al 2011), apricot (Soliman 2012), annatto (Siril and Joseph 2013), and seedless lemon (Goswami et al 2013). In contrast, RAPD analysis reported genetic variation in poplar (Ostry et al 1994;Rani et al 1995), white spruce (Isabel et al 1995(Isabel et al , 1996, peach (Hashmi et al 1997), teak (Gangopadhyay et al 2003), Idaho locust (Ngezahayo et al 2006), stone pine (Cuesta et al 2010), and olive (Leva et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genetic stability of in vitro-propagated plants should be assessed as early as possible, especially in long-living trees such as conifers (Marum et al 2009). At present, different molecular analytical techniques are used to highlight somaclonal variation in tissue culture and regenerants of several plants (Leva et al 2012). Several researchers have used RAPD techniques to investigate genetic variability and have found it very efficient and reliable (Goto et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were observed by the Escandon et al [15], they reported the change of leaf and flower size of the Brahmi after treatment with Colchicine. Babil et al [28], Leva et al [6], Mujib [29] and Omidbaigi et al [30] also reported the effects of the colchicines on the leaf size of various plants. Many other researchers have reported that the increase of ploidy often causes anatomical and structural changes in the plants [10].…”
Section: Effect Colchicine Treatments On Morphology Of Regenerated Plmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there is abnormal pigmentation observed in the leaves showing yellowish, pale yellow and colourless leaves (Figure 5c and 5d) and the variations in the leaf shape and size (Figure 5b-5e) as compare to the normal plant regenerated without colchicine treatment. Leva et al [6] suggested that the morphological characters are used for the detection of somaclonal variation. However, these variations were not continued, when recultured on the same regeneration media, hence these variations are the epigenetic somaclonal variations [18].…”
Section: Effect Colchicine Treatments On Morphology Of Regenerated Plmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Leva et al (2012), the system by which the regeneration is induced, type of tissue, explant source, media components and the duration of the culture cycle are some of the factors that are involved in inducing variation during culture. in vitro CONCLUSIONS RAPD assay could detect genetic changes in micropropagated pineapple so that it can be used as early detection of off-type plant.…”
Section: Shorter Period Of Culture Could Suppress the Somaclonal Varimentioning
confidence: 99%