2000
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/38.7.315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-Phase Microextraction Method for the Quantitative Analysis of Styrene in Water

Abstract: A headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) method is developed for the determination of styrene in drinking water. Gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry is utilized for qualitative analysis. A manual SPME holder with 85-microm polyacrylate coating is used to extract the styrene from water, which is determined to have good linearity (correlation coefficient r = 0.9999 for 1.00-100.00 microg/L range), a relative standard deviation of 1.9%, and a detection limit of 0.30 microg/L. This method is compare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows a comparative evaluation of their performance. For conventional chromatography (including GC/FID, GC/MS and HPLC )28293031, off-line sample pretreatment and preconcentration steps are required. Although latest attempts circumventing this step via e.g., membrane inlet proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (MI-PTRMS) techniques32 and coupling of membrane inlets GC/MS33, the rather complex operating procedures and high instrumental costs still limit their widespread application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows a comparative evaluation of their performance. For conventional chromatography (including GC/FID, GC/MS and HPLC )28293031, off-line sample pretreatment and preconcentration steps are required. Although latest attempts circumventing this step via e.g., membrane inlet proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (MI-PTRMS) techniques32 and coupling of membrane inlets GC/MS33, the rather complex operating procedures and high instrumental costs still limit their widespread application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one study used a HP‐FFAP column for styrene (Paraskevopoulou and others ) and Rtx‐5 column for oligomers. In another study with GC‐FID, Gramshaw and Vandenburg () used a BP‐1 column (oven temperature 200 °C) and injecting in a cold on‐column mode, while a HP‐5 column was used with a lower oven temperature program (from 50 to 150 °C), followed by SPME extraction (Silva and others ). Dynamic headspace chromatography equipped with purge‐and‐trap injector, and a FID detector was used to determine styrene in yogurt (Ehret‐Henry and others ), employing separation on a DB‐5 column (30 m × 0.32 mm).…”
Section: Analysis Of Monomers and Oligomersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied protocol was similar to the method developed by Silva et al (2000). An Agilent Technologies 7890A GC system with a 5975C inert mass selective detector (MSD) multi-purpose sampler was used.…”
Section: Headspace Solid Phase Micro-extraction Gas Chromatography-mamentioning
confidence: 99%