2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar district heating with solar desalination using energy storage material for domestic hot water and drinking water – Environmental and economic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research endeavors have examined the cost per liter (CPL) of four different types of solar stills. Results indicate that the CPL of conventional solar stills, porous surface absorber solar stills, PCM porous surface absorber solar stills, and nano-enhanced PCM-porous surface absorber solar stills were 0.121, 0.107, 0.106, and 0.098 $/L, respectively 63 . Previously, enhanced solar desalination technique utilizing 2 cm-sized stones resulted in a production cost of 0.017 $/L/m 2 , whereas the traditional method cost was 0.02 $/L/m 2 .…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous research endeavors have examined the cost per liter (CPL) of four different types of solar stills. Results indicate that the CPL of conventional solar stills, porous surface absorber solar stills, PCM porous surface absorber solar stills, and nano-enhanced PCM-porous surface absorber solar stills were 0.121, 0.107, 0.106, and 0.098 $/L, respectively 63 . Previously, enhanced solar desalination technique utilizing 2 cm-sized stones resulted in a production cost of 0.017 $/L/m 2 , whereas the traditional method cost was 0.02 $/L/m 2 .…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Shoeibi et al [97] designed a solar WDS for district heating as well as drinking water in domestic applications. Nano-enhanced phase-change material (NePCM) of copper oxide nanoparticles in paraffin wax with 0.2 wt% concentration was employed in an SS-WDS and absorber with a porous surface to conserve the available thermal energy and improve the system performance of the district heating.…”
Section: Solar Stillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual net amount of CO 2 reduction in the device is achieved by E product × n × 2 and is calculated by 54 φco2,en=2((Een)out×n)1000, ${\varphi }_{{\mathrm{co}}_{2,\mathrm{en}}}=\frac{{{2((E}_{\mathrm{en}})}_{\mathrm{out}}\times n)}{1000},$ φco2,ex=2((Eex)out×n)1000. ${\varphi }_{{\mathrm{co}}_{2},ex}=\frac{{{2((E}_{\mathrm{ex}})}_{\mathrm{out}}\times n)}{1000}.$…”
Section: Economic and Environmental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%