2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57219-7_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Respiration in Beech and Spruce Forests in Europe: Trends, Controlling Factors, Annual Budgets and Implications for the Ecosystem Carbon Balance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
21
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were found by Matteucci et al (2000), Sotta et al (2004) and Savage et al (2009), all of whom found this rainfall influence, but for other soil types.…”
Section: Rainfall Effectsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Similar results were found by Matteucci et al (2000), Sotta et al (2004) and Savage et al (2009), all of whom found this rainfall influence, but for other soil types.…”
Section: Rainfall Effectsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Soil CO 2 efflux has been modeled using linear (Witkamp 1966;Anderson 1973), power (Kucera and Kirkham 1971), and sigmoid (Schlentner and van Cleve 1985;Janssens et al 1999;Matteucci et al 2000) relationships with temperature (Table 12.1). However, exponential rela-A.…”
Section: Temperature Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In drought-stressed ecosystems, soil CO 2 efflux usually peaks in spring and after rain events (Matteucci et al 2000). Soil temperature is often poorly correlated with soil CO 2 efflux ( Fig.…”
Section: Moisture Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the role of microorganisms in soil processes, their presence and biomass significantly affect the level of CO 2 emission from soils (Nannipieri et al, 2003), which is the result of root respiration and physiological processes of the microorganisms involved in the decomposition of organic material. Emissions of CO 2 from soils appear to be highly variable in heterogeneous soil micro-sites, and they are influenced by the activity of roots, microbial processes, crop residue and litter content, microclimate and catalytic properties of clay colloids (Matteucci et al, 2000). In this pot experiment, besides two gaseous carbon compounds, only the volume of carbon dioxide emission was affected by the type of nitrogen fertilization (Table 2., Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%