2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2019.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil physical and mechanical attributes in response to successive harvests under sugarcane cultivation in Northeastern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the similar conditions observed in SCplant and SCratoon related to soil water dynamics, sugarcane fields are still susceptible to soil compaction [51,52], mainly in the 10-20 cm layer. The risk of compaction in sugarcane fields is dependent not only on machinery traffic but also on the management system [46].…”
Section: Sustainable Management Practice To Enhance Water Dynamics Inmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite the similar conditions observed in SCplant and SCratoon related to soil water dynamics, sugarcane fields are still susceptible to soil compaction [51,52], mainly in the 10-20 cm layer. The risk of compaction in sugarcane fields is dependent not only on machinery traffic but also on the management system [46].…”
Section: Sustainable Management Practice To Enhance Water Dynamics Inmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Because of this reduction, they reported higher susceptibility to soil compaction, increasing bulk density, and reducing macroporosity. Cavalcanti et al (2019) show the importance of increasing OM on soil physical properties in a Ultisol grown with sugarcane, which reduces bulk density and minimizes the compaction process. The NB SJ and CH LG had similar behavior, with volume below the critical limit close to DC 90.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Changes in soil bulk density, water content at the field capacity and soil texture and structure may affected these soil physical functionalities. Furthermore, loss of soil structure and changes in soil texture due to intensive tillage for sugarcane monoculture systems and successive mechanized harvesting with heavy machinery (Silva et al 2018;Cavalcanti et al 2019) during long crop growth cycle seems to have induced consequent changes in pore architecture, soil particle size distribution which caused changes in soil water retention and negatively impacted field capacity.…”
Section: Effects Of Long-term Sugarcane Monoculture On Some Soil Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected that in the long term, consecutive mechanized harvests and tillage for sugarcane replanting will lead to induce the formation of plough pans, with significant reductions in soil pore spaces and water availability leading to deterioration of soil physical functions for plant growth (Cavalcanti et al 2019(Cavalcanti et al , 2020de Lima et al 2020;Jimenez et al, 2020). Cherubin et al (2016), observed that physical quality of the soil reduced by 90-56% of its full capacity from native vegetation soils to sugarcane as the consecutive monoculture of sugarcane deteriorated the soil physical quality for plant growth.…”
Section: Effects Of Long-term Sugarcane Monoculture On Some Soil Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%